2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-shell energy levels and radiative rates for transitions in Si xi

Abstract: Context. Atomic data for K-shell transitions are essential for modeling the K absorption lines, which have been observed in the spectra of active galaxies by high-resolution X-ray observatories, e.g. XMM, Chandra, and Suzaku. These accurate atomic data are also needed for line identifications and spectroscopic diagnostic of plasmas in laboratory generated by laser or beam-foil method. Aims. We calculate atomic data using the atomic code flexible atomic code (FAC) taking relativistic effects and configuration i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available experimental measurements by Faenov et al (1994) are listed in Table 2. The largest wavelength difference between our FAC6 calculations and those of the experimental results is 8 mÅ, which is consistent with our former work on Si xi (Wei et al 2010). Theoretical calculations from Palmeri et al (2008) with the code HFR are also listed in Table 2, labeled HFR1.…”
Section: Energy Levels and Wavelengthssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The available experimental measurements by Faenov et al (1994) are listed in Table 2. The largest wavelength difference between our FAC6 calculations and those of the experimental results is 8 mÅ, which is consistent with our former work on Si xi (Wei et al 2010). Theoretical calculations from Palmeri et al (2008) with the code HFR are also listed in Table 2, labeled HFR1.…”
Section: Energy Levels and Wavelengthssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The main reason A105, page 2 of 7 for the large differences between FAC6 and HFR1 are that the CI effects from the high-energy configurations have been included in FAC6. This phenomenon also occurred in our previous work on Si xi (Wei et al 2010). The compiled energy levels from the NIST database (Ralchenko et al 2013) are also listed in Table 1 (hereafter NIST).…”
Section: Energy Levels and Wavelengthssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though quite recent, FAC has become of widespread use in various research fields, and its precision has been widely tested by experiments (for instance: Aggarwal et al 2010;Aggarwal et al 2011;Clementson et al 2010;Hahn et al 2010;Wei et al 2010). The versatility and speed of FAC allowed us by running numerous test cases to systematically construct a coherent and homogeneous set of data for nineteen ions of scandium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%