The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1177/17455057221093037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Justice for Incarcerated Moms Act of 2021: Reflections and recommendations

Abstract: In the last five decades, the number of women behind bars in the United States has risen exponentially. It is now estimated that there are nearly 58,000 admissions of pregnant people—disproportionately women of color—to jails and prisons each year. Recognizing the urgency and consequences of mass incarceration on pregnant people, their families, and communities, House Resolution 948: Justice for Incarcerated Moms Act of 2021 was introduced to Congress as a part of the Black Maternal Health Momnibus. The Justic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estelle vs. Gamble (1976) established that all incarcerated persons are entitled to health care for "serious medical needs;" however, adherence to professional standards for perinatal care in carceral settings (e.g., ACOG, 2021;NCCHC, 2020;Sufrin, 2018) is not monitored or enforced, resulting in varied policies, programs, and outcomes across the U.S. (Buchanan, 2012). State and federal initiatives have begun to expand support for women who are incarcerated during pregnancy (Kotlar et al, 2015;Schroeder & Bell, 2005); however services vary widely in their accessibly and provision of care (Shlafer et al, 2022;Wilson et al, 2022). Indeed, it is notable that even amongst the growing body of literature on enhanced perinatal programs in carceral settings (e.g., Wilson et al, 2022), comprehensive programs specifically targeting mental health and addiction amongst this population are rare (Steely Smith, Wilson et al, 2023a;Steely Smith et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estelle vs. Gamble (1976) established that all incarcerated persons are entitled to health care for "serious medical needs;" however, adherence to professional standards for perinatal care in carceral settings (e.g., ACOG, 2021;NCCHC, 2020;Sufrin, 2018) is not monitored or enforced, resulting in varied policies, programs, and outcomes across the U.S. (Buchanan, 2012). State and federal initiatives have begun to expand support for women who are incarcerated during pregnancy (Kotlar et al, 2015;Schroeder & Bell, 2005); however services vary widely in their accessibly and provision of care (Shlafer et al, 2022;Wilson et al, 2022). Indeed, it is notable that even amongst the growing body of literature on enhanced perinatal programs in carceral settings (e.g., Wilson et al, 2022), comprehensive programs specifically targeting mental health and addiction amongst this population are rare (Steely Smith, Wilson et al, 2023a;Steely Smith et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers helped inform programming in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Michigan, and Virginia. The federal prison system is currently considering implementing lactation and doula care for every qualified person in federal custody [ 25 ].…”
Section: Case Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%