2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced perinatal programs for people in prisons: A summary of six states' programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estelle vs. Gamble (1976) established that all incarcerated persons are entitled to health care for "serious medical needs;" however, adherence to professional standards for perinatal care in carceral settings (e.g., ACOG, 2021;NCCHC, 2020;Sufrin, 2018) is not monitored or enforced, resulting in varied policies, programs, and outcomes across the U.S. (Buchanan, 2012). State and federal initiatives have begun to expand support for women who are incarcerated during pregnancy (Kotlar et al, 2015;Schroeder & Bell, 2005); however services vary widely in their accessibly and provision of care (Shlafer et al, 2022;Wilson et al, 2022). Indeed, it is notable that even amongst the growing body of literature on enhanced perinatal programs in carceral settings (e.g., Wilson et al, 2022), comprehensive programs specifically targeting mental health and addiction amongst this population are rare (Steely Smith, Wilson et al, 2023a;Steely Smith et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estelle vs. Gamble (1976) established that all incarcerated persons are entitled to health care for "serious medical needs;" however, adherence to professional standards for perinatal care in carceral settings (e.g., ACOG, 2021;NCCHC, 2020;Sufrin, 2018) is not monitored or enforced, resulting in varied policies, programs, and outcomes across the U.S. (Buchanan, 2012). State and federal initiatives have begun to expand support for women who are incarcerated during pregnancy (Kotlar et al, 2015;Schroeder & Bell, 2005); however services vary widely in their accessibly and provision of care (Shlafer et al, 2022;Wilson et al, 2022). Indeed, it is notable that even amongst the growing body of literature on enhanced perinatal programs in carceral settings (e.g., Wilson et al, 2022), comprehensive programs specifically targeting mental health and addiction amongst this population are rare (Steely Smith, Wilson et al, 2023a;Steely Smith et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State and federal initiatives have begun to expand support for women who are incarcerated during pregnancy (Kotlar et al, 2015;Schroeder & Bell, 2005); however services vary widely in their accessibly and provision of care (Shlafer et al, 2022;Wilson et al, 2022). Indeed, it is notable that even amongst the growing body of literature on enhanced perinatal programs in carceral settings (e.g., Wilson et al, 2022), comprehensive programs specifically targeting mental health and addiction amongst this population are rare (Steely Smith, Wilson et al, 2023a;Steely Smith et al, 2023b). 5 Taken together, our findings and those from past studies at the intersection of incarceration and pregnancy raise critical questions about when and for whom incarceration-rather than diversion to community-based treatment or alternative sentencing-is acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%