Justice at Sea: Fishers’ politics and marine conservation in coastal Odisha, India

Abstract

This is a paper about the politics of fishing rights in and around the Gahirmatha marine sanctuary in coastal Odisha, in eastern India. Claims to the resources of this sanctuary are politicised through the creation of a particularly damaging narrative by influential Odiya environmental actors about Bengalis, as illegal immigrants who have hurt the ecosystem through their fishing practices. Anchored within a theoretical framework of justice as recognition, the paper considers the making of a regional Odiya environmentalism that is, potentially, deeply exclusionary. It details how an argument about 'illegal Bengalis' depriving 'indigenous Odiyas' of their legitimate 'traditional fishing rights' derives from particular notions of indigeneity and territory. But the paper also shows that such environmentalism is tenuous, and fits uneasily with the everyday social landscape of fishing in coastal Odisha. It concludes that a wider class conflict between small fishers and the state over a sanctuary sets the context in which questions about legitimate resource rights are raised, sometimes with important effects, like when out at sea.

‘This is my garden’: justice claims and struggles over forests in Vietnam’s REDD+

“…Social actors tend to assert plural notions of justice, although very often only some of these notions gain support and come to be considered legitimate by other actors. In addition, some notions are more visible, while others face difficulties in being heard because of differences in wealth, power or identities (Chhotray, 2016;Schroeder, St. Martin, Wilson, & Sen, 2008).…”

How can traditional livelihoods find a place in contemporary conservation politics debates in India? Understanding community perspectives in Sundarban, West Bengal

“…Knowledge cannot be the property [emphasis added] of a specific group over a period of time and cannot be characterised in a particular way (Agrawal 1995: 423). The "indigenistnativist environmental discourse" shaping dominant environmental thinking misrecognizes the ecological knowledge that other communities might possess (Chhotray 2016). We argue that cultural rights and identities are equally important within non-indigenous communities.…”

“…Despite practicing traditional and sustainable fishing, analogous to indigenous methods of subsistence-based livelihoods, the Forest Department refuses to regard the forest fishers as indigenous. This "indigenist" assertion questions the "authenticity" of the forest fishers as they seek legitimacy for their livelihood claims (Chhotray 2016). Since state bodies are empowered to control and regulate natural resources, they consider enforcement or coercive conservation as the easiest way of establishing control over people and resources (Gadgil and Rao 1995;Peluso 1993: 201).…”

The political agenda of implementing Forest Rights Act 2006: evidences from Indian Sundarban

“…Referred to as the 'politics of claim making', the authors explain how different actors organize mobilizations to articulate their 'legitimacy' and prioritize their claims to FRA over others. Similar issues on claim making and struggles for establishing legitimacy of rights have been observed within the Bengali and Odiya fishers in coastal Odisha (Chhotray 2016). Resembling a 'politics of differential engagement' as termed by Karthik and Menon (2016: 44), the enactment and the implementation of the act is seen as contingent upon the political capacity of several actors.…”