2012
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2012.729569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Just green enough: contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
168
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors plead for "just green enough" policies that seek to maintain industrial character and working class neighbourhood while improving quality of life without upscale prestige developments or interrogate how urban sustainability can be used to open up a space for diversity and democracy in the neoliberal city. (Curran andHamilton 2012, p. 1027) Similar discussions have emerged in relation to the introduction of environmentallyfriendly technologies such as thermal insulation of residential buildings which under some circumstances also may lead to increasing rents and displacement (Großmann et al 2014). …”
Section: Thesis 2 In Order To Meet the Ambition Of Combined Effects Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other authors plead for "just green enough" policies that seek to maintain industrial character and working class neighbourhood while improving quality of life without upscale prestige developments or interrogate how urban sustainability can be used to open up a space for diversity and democracy in the neoliberal city. (Curran andHamilton 2012, p. 1027) Similar discussions have emerged in relation to the introduction of environmentallyfriendly technologies such as thermal insulation of residential buildings which under some circumstances also may lead to increasing rents and displacement (Großmann et al 2014). …”
Section: Thesis 2 In Order To Meet the Ambition Of Combined Effects Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be here: The upgrade in itself is not the problem but rather the oftentimes selective character and the uneven distribution of the resulting benefits (high-quality green housing, access to high-quality green space) and burdens (displacement, exclusion from high-end green spaces) or, to put it differently, the lack of moderately priced or social housing within those development schemes. NBS cannot resolve the problem of sociospatial inequality in cities; under circumstances, they can have very positive coeffects for poorer dwellers, too (Curran and Hamilton 2012;McKendry and Janos 2015). But much depends on a deliberate consideration of existing inequalities and the potential unequal chances of gaining access to the benefits of green projects or policies.…”
Section: Nature-based Solutions To Support Socially Inclusivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These radical acts of reclaiming space for food sovereignty may inadvertently contribute to and perpetuate existing inequalities [11,[27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is room for better coordination across bureaucratic silos; primarily, "urban agriculture policies should be integrated with affordable housing policies, neighborhood planning and zoning initiatives to more systematically design gardens and farms into new residential developments" [87]. In a policy brief explicitly addressing gentrification, Cohen outlines a series of strategies for resisting displacement: forging alliances with housing organizations, aligning "just green enough" and "just food enough" strategies [125], and civic engagement in negotiating terms for new development projects such as community benefits agreements.…”
Section: City Planning Spotlight: Nycmentioning
confidence: 99%