1983
DOI: 10.2307/3033793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Just Because She Doesn't Want to Doesn't Mean It's Rape: An Experimentally Based Causal Model of the Perception of Rape in a Dating Situation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this view puts an overly restrictive framework around victims' experiences, which do not usually conform to this stereotype (e.g., Koss, Heise, & Russo, 1994;Littleton, Tabernik, Canelas, & Backstrom, 2009). Research in this area shows that participants are less likely to label hypothetical incidents of forced sexual intercourse as rape if they contain some aspects of normative sexual scripts, such as a victim and perpetrator who are in a romantic relationship (e.g., Hannon, Kuntz, Van Laar, Williams, & Hall, 1996;Shotland & Goodstein, 1983).…”
Section: Labeling Sexual Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this view puts an overly restrictive framework around victims' experiences, which do not usually conform to this stereotype (e.g., Koss, Heise, & Russo, 1994;Littleton, Tabernik, Canelas, & Backstrom, 2009). Research in this area shows that participants are less likely to label hypothetical incidents of forced sexual intercourse as rape if they contain some aspects of normative sexual scripts, such as a victim and perpetrator who are in a romantic relationship (e.g., Hannon, Kuntz, Van Laar, Williams, & Hall, 1996;Shotland & Goodstein, 1983).…”
Section: Labeling Sexual Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situational factors studied include victim and perpetrator attractiveness, victim dress, victim and perpetrator alcohol consumption, the timing of a victim's initial resistance to sexual advances, and the degree of relationship between victim and perpetrator. Specifically, victims tend to be judged more negatively and perpetrators less negatively when the victim is physically unattractive (Vrij and Firmin 2001), when she is shown wearing a short skirt compared to a longer skirt (Workman and Freeburg 1999), when both victim and assailant had been drinking (Norris and Cubbins 1992), when the victim waits until after engaging in sexual activity to resist (Kopper 1996;Shotland and Goodstein 1983), and when the victim and perpetrator are previously acquainted (Abrams et al 2003;Bell et al 1994;Frese et al 2004). …”
Section: Judgments Of Rape Victimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research suggests that the extent of force used to coerce sex is negatively associated with the level of responsibility assigned to the victim (e.g., Shotland and Goodstein 1983). Presumably, degree of force is inversely related to how controllable and thus avoidable a coercive event may appear to be.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%