2000
DOI: 10.3917/gen.041.0125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juristes et sociologues français d'après-guerre : une rencontre sans lendemain

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Belin. © Belin. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But despite the range of his work, his lead was not taken up by other lawyers nor sociologists 106 and was even subject to sharp criticism. 107 It is only more recently that social scientists in France have rediscovered the legal dimensions of the social world.…”
Section: Beyond the Law Facultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But despite the range of his work, his lead was not taken up by other lawyers nor sociologists 106 and was even subject to sharp criticism. 107 It is only more recently that social scientists in France have rediscovered the legal dimensions of the social world.…”
Section: Beyond the Law Facultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From there, what can be seen in the field of socio-legal research may be described as a dissemination of the interest in legality as a social question through various channels. The rejuvenation of legal sociology may thus have required a partial neglect of the history of the sub-discipline, explaining today's lack of interest towards Carbonnier or Gurvitch (Soubiran-Paillet, 2000) and their rather fuzzy and somehow methodologically blurry conception of legal sociology. In contrast, it is through the deep empirical analysis of various subjects, at the crossroads of various sociological traditions and methods, that the sociology of law re-emerged.…”
Section: Institutional Legacies and Hidden Heritagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Daniel Pécaut (1996) has shown, when the moment of separation arrived, the justification of an autonomous sociology ran counter to the Durkheimian tradition, represented above all in the work of Gurvitch 50 . Both Marxist visions—with G. Friedmann at the head—and liberal views—led by Raymond Aron—tried to separate from their interdisciplinary origins and specially from any reference to law (Pécaut 1996; Soubiran-Paillet 1994, 2000).…”
Section: The Structure Of Legal Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%