Jumpstart just-in-time signaling protocol: a formal description using extended finite state machines

Zaim, Abdül Halim

doi:10.1117/1.1533795

Cited by 30 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Building on our experience with the design and prototyping of the Just-in-Time protocol suite [4], [5], [30], we outline a framework consisting of (1) building blocks of fine-grain functionality, (2) explicit support for combining elemental blocks to accomplish highly configurable complex communication tasks, and (3) control elements to facilitate (what is currently referred to as) crosslayer interactions. We take a holistic view of network design, allowing applications to work synergistically with the network architecture and physical layers to select the most appropriate functional blocks and tune their behavior so as to meet the application's needs within resource availability constraints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the second area of research, we designed techniques for pushing services onto hardware, and for efficiently processing message headers that convey service requests [5], [30]. JumpStart's Just-in-Time (JIT) is an open protocol suite with multicast extensions which was developed under the assumption of an optical core and wireless access networks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The SILO Architecture for Services Integration, controL, and Optimization for the Future Internet

Dutta

Rouskas

Baldin

et al. 2007

2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-We propose a new internetworking architecture that represents a departure from current philosophy and practice, as a contribution to the ongoing debate regarding the future Internet. Building upon our experience with the design and prototyping of the Just-in-Time protocol suite, we outline a framework consisting of (1) building blocks of fine-grain functionality, (2) explicit support for combining elemental blocks to accomplish highly configurable complex communication tasks, and (3) control elements to facilitate (what is currently referred to as) cross-layer interactions. In this position paper, we take a holistic view of network design, allowing applications to work synergistically with the network architecture and physical layers to select the most appropriate functional blocks and tune their behavior so as to meet the application's needs within resource availability constraints. The proposed architecture is flexible and extensible so as to foster innovation and accommodate change, it supports a unified Internet, it allows for the integration of security and management features at any point in (what is now referred to as) the networking stack, and it is positioned to take advantage of hardware-based performance-enhancing techniques.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The SILO Architecture for Services Integration, controL, and Optimization for the Future Internet

Dutta

Rouskas

Baldin

et al. 2007

2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Optical burst switching (OBS) [2,3,8,14,16,17] has been proposed as an alternative paradigm to overcome the technical limitations of optical packet switching (OPS), namely the lack of optical random access memory and the problems with synchronization. OBS combines the best of OPS and circuit switching, and it is a technical compromise between wavelength routing (i.e., circuit switching) and optical packet switching, since it does not require optical buffering or packet-level processing and is more efficient than circuit switching if the traffic volume does not require a full wavelength channel.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different optical burst switching mechanisms may choose different offset values in this range. Tell And Go (TAG) [15], just-in-time (JIT) [16], JumpStart [2,3,17], JIT + [13], just-enough-time (JET) [8] and Horizon [14] are examples of one-way resource reservation protocols.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Implications of Meshing Degree for Optical Burst Switched Networks Using One-Way Resource Reservation Protocols

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper discusses performance implications of meshing degree (or nodal degree) for optical burst switching (OBS) mesh networks using one-way resource reservation protocols. The analysis is focused on the following topologies: rings, chordal rings with nodal degrees ranging from three to six, mesh-torus, NSFNET, ARPANET and the European Optical Network (EON). It is shown that the largest nodal degree gain, due to the increase of the nodal degree from two to around three, is observed for degree-three chordal ring topology, where as the smallest gain is observed for the ARPANET. For these cases, the magnitude of the nodal degree gain is slightly less than three orders for the degree-three chordal ring and less than one order of magnitude for the ARPANET. On the other hand, when the nodal degree increases from two to a value ranging from about four up to six, the nodal degree gain ranges between four and six orders of magnitude for chordal rings. However, EON, which has a nodal degree slightly less than four has the smallest nodal degree gain. The observed gain for this case is less than one order of magnitude. Since burst loss is a key issue in OBS networks, these results clearly show the importance of meshing degree for this kind of networks.

show abstract

“…Each WDM link consists of control channels used to transmit BHPs, and data channels used to transmit data bursts. The channel scheduling algorithms considered can also be easily modified to work with other commonly used signaling techniques such as just in time (JIT) [2]- [4]. In this paper, we assume that every channel consists of a wavelength and that each OBS core router has wavelength-conversion capability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Segmentation-based nonpreemptive channel scheduling algorithms for optical burst-switched networks

Vokkarane

Jue

2005

J. Lightwave Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-One of the key components in the design of optical burst-switched nodes is the development of channel scheduling algorithms that can efficiently handle data burst contentions. Traditional scheduling techniques use approaches such as wavelength conversion and buffering to resolve burst contention. In this paper, we propose nonpreemptive scheduling algorithms that use burst segmentation to resolve burst contentions. We propose two segmentation-based scheduling algorithms, namely, nonpreemptive minimum overlapping channel (NP-MOC) and NP-MOC with void filling (NP-MOC-VF), which can significantly reduce the loss experienced in an optical burst-switched network. We further reduce packet loss by combining burst segmentation and fiber delay lines (FDLs) to resolve contentions during channel scheduling. We propose two types of scheduling algorithms that are classified based on the placement of the FDL buffers in the optical burst-switched node. These algorithms are referred to as delay-first or segment-first algorithms. The scheduling algorithms with burst segmentation and FDLs are investigated through extensive simulations. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithms can effectively reduce the packet-loss probability compared to existing scheduling techniques. The delay-first algorithms are suitable for applications that have higher delay tolerance and strict loss constraints, while the segment-first algorithms are suitable for applications with higher loss tolerance and strict delay constraints.Index Terms-Burst segmentation, burst switching, channel scheduling, fiber delay lines (FDLs), IP/wavelength division multiplexing (WDM), optical networks, wavelength conversion.

show abstract

Jumpstart just-in-time signaling protocol: a formal description using extended finite state machines

Cited by 30 publications

References 12 publications

The SILO Architecture for Services Integration, controL, and Optimization for the Future Internet

The SILO Architecture for Services Integration, controL, and Optimization for the Future Internet

Performance Implications of Meshing Degree for Optical Burst Switched Networks Using One-Way Resource Reservation Protocols

Segmentation-based nonpreemptive channel scheduling algorithms for optical burst-switched networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About