“…84 These modifications essentially codified ECJ rulings and illustrate well the vital role of the Court in advancing the integration process that several scholars point out. 85 However, we should not underestimate the role of the market, and the actual labour migration, in enabling the equalisation through the dissociation-unification process.…”
The paper outlines the insights we gain by drawing on Michel Foucault’s study of governmentality in the light of the importance of Ordoliberalism as a structuring principle of European integration. It further develops this perspective by interrelating it to a critical state theoretical perspective and sociology of competition with a view to contributing to a better understanding of the role of competition in establishing social bonds. A key concept the paper develops is competitive solidarity. The second part of the paper provides a more empirical analysis of an emerging competitive solidarity at European level, highlighting the interaction between solidarity and competition in the sphere of European social policy. The analysis of this sui generis social policy provides interesting insights into the complexity of the attempt to establish European social bonds, paving the way for a European society.
“…84 These modifications essentially codified ECJ rulings and illustrate well the vital role of the Court in advancing the integration process that several scholars point out. 85 However, we should not underestimate the role of the market, and the actual labour migration, in enabling the equalisation through the dissociation-unification process.…”
The paper outlines the insights we gain by drawing on Michel Foucault’s study of governmentality in the light of the importance of Ordoliberalism as a structuring principle of European integration. It further develops this perspective by interrelating it to a critical state theoretical perspective and sociology of competition with a view to contributing to a better understanding of the role of competition in establishing social bonds. A key concept the paper develops is competitive solidarity. The second part of the paper provides a more empirical analysis of an emerging competitive solidarity at European level, highlighting the interaction between solidarity and competition in the sphere of European social policy. The analysis of this sui generis social policy provides interesting insights into the complexity of the attempt to establish European social bonds, paving the way for a European society.
“…98 Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and its MS, and Japan, OJ 2018 L 216/4. 99 On this issue see Dawson et al (2013), Horsley (2013), Lienbacher (2013), Martinsen (2015).…”
“…That, of course, does not mean that all of its rulings are automatically accepted. This is especially true where the CJEU develops innovative doctrines, sometimes in clear opposition to the intent of the EU legislature (Dawson et al ., 2013; de Waele, 2010). Examples for such types of judgments include the creation of an obligation to recognise other Member States’ product regulations, the CJEU's very permissive definition of what constitutes a ‘worker’ who would enjoy unrestricted free-movement rights, its (initially) generous interpretation of migrant citizens’ access to host state welfare benefits, its very restrictive interpretation of the national labour market rules that can be applied to posted workers or its development of the concept of age discrimination in labour market rules.…”
Section: Forms Of Resistance Against the Cjeumentioning
This contribution reviews different forms of resistance against the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). While backlash is rare, various forms of pushback are more common than accounts of the CJEU's apparent success suggest. It is not uncommon that national policy-makers, administrations and the judiciary fail to comply with individual rulings. Moreover, Member State authorities have developed multiple strategies to limit the practical effect of controversial lines of CJEU case-law. The availability of ‘work-arounds’ that national authorities can live with shields the CJEU against significant backlash. At the same time, the multiple processes of pushback in the Member States lead to an outcome of considerable heterogeneity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.