Judicial Activism and Its Implications for Good Governance: A Case for Judicial Reforms in Pakistan

Abstract

Judicial activism plays an important role in shaping various countries' political contexts with different political systems and regime types. Academic literature and debates are divided among various groups in favour and against judicial activism. This work reviews range of available data to probe case of judicial activism in Pakistan from 2005 to 2013. Judicial activism in Pakistan seemed to be short-lived and selective in nature. The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) exercised activism without limits in cases against representative parliamentarians who were already constrained in many matters by other unconstitutional powers. No doubt, it reviewed various malpractices of the executive in the domain of public policy and governance, which enhanced its legitimacy and popularity. A vibrant media further contributed to the Court's popularity. But the transgression of institutional boundaries by the apex court for 'pious' objectives failed to introduce judicial reforms and eradication of corruption in the lower judiciary. Selectivity in the SCP activism was visible in its limitation to implement some of its verdicts against ex-military officers. This paper discusses these contradictions within the activism by the higher judiciary in Pakistan, and suggests various recommendations in the latter part of the paper.

Legal Certainty Principle in Judicial Activism Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Case Number 143/PUU-XXI/2023

“…Consequentialist interpretation, which is an interpretation that foresees the consequences of interpersonal decisions. Systemic interpretation is an interpretation where there is consistency between treaties with each other 15 . The cases of Van Gend en Loos (C-26/62) and Costa vs. Enel (C-6/64), are examples of judicial activism at the CJEU.…”

“…DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1537268 14 loc.cit. 15 Fabien Terpan, Sabine Saurugger, op.cit., pp. 4.…”

Pakistan’s economy: The Role of International Institutions (2018-2022)

“…Moreover, without doubt military generals are more influential and more powerful they intervene in the affairs of parliament, courts and other institutions like NAB, election commission and so on (Reayat et al, 2021). Owing to the maintenance of their dominancy they are using their clouts to bring artificial and fragile government which would dependent upon them (Tomczyk & Ewertowski, 2023).…”

Role of NAB in Eliminating Corruption from Pakistan: A Critical Analysis

“…Appointments, particularly in the police service, are often influenced by politics in countries like Pakistan. It's natural for a public figure to have conflicts of interest due to their personal loyalties and familial ties (Reayat et al, 2021). Hence, wealthy individuals and corporations continue to take advantage of the poor through extortion, fake penalties, and other forms of corruption with the assistance of the police.…”