2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11196-015-9442-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judges as Readers, Authors and Dialecticians: Legal Interpretation in the ECtHR Cases on Mental Disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular importance is the consideration of legal regulation of the procedure for the courts, judicial departments and media interaction, the goals and forms of their cooperation, as well as problems that arise in the Russian media when publishing information about the activities of the courts. Soboleva (2016) notes in her research that "the Russian and international societies in the field of law are of the following opinion: it is information openness and transparency that play a key role in building and strengthening court credibility. Only by this democratic way, it is possible to restore public confidence in the judicial system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular importance is the consideration of legal regulation of the procedure for the courts, judicial departments and media interaction, the goals and forms of their cooperation, as well as problems that arise in the Russian media when publishing information about the activities of the courts. Soboleva (2016) notes in her research that "the Russian and international societies in the field of law are of the following opinion: it is information openness and transparency that play a key role in building and strengthening court credibility. Only by this democratic way, it is possible to restore public confidence in the judicial system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%