2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4983569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joule-heating-supported plasma filamentation and branching during subcritical microwave irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Takahashi et al . 21 discussed structure formation with the ionization model. However, this model, in which the expansion wave is in front of the ionization front, has not yet been verified experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takahashi et al . 21 discussed structure formation with the ionization model. However, this model, in which the expansion wave is in front of the ionization front, has not yet been verified experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the correct propagation physics of the ionization front was not captured by Nakamura's model because the change of the breakdown threshold was not validated. In 2017, Takahashi et al numerically reproduced the plasma filamentation and branching structure during subcritical microwave beam irradiation based on the effective diffusion model proposed by Boeuf et al when it was coupled with a compressible fluid dynamics simulation for neutral particles and Maxwell's equation [88]. Coupling simulation between the plasma and the neutral particles can capture changes of the electron's transport coefficient induced by variation of the neutral particle density.…”
Section: Breakdown Physics During a Subcritical Beam Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comb-shaped filamentary structure was formed at much lower intensity than the breakdown threshold. Takahashi et al [46,47] proposed a numerical model considering compressibility of the ambient gas. Results showed that expansion behind a precursor shock wave enhances the effective field intensity to near the threshold in front of the plasma.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Millimeter-wave Discharge Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Millimeter-wave discharge occurs even at the beam intensity far below breakdown threshold [44]. This discharge cannot be explained by field concentration nor by ambient gas expansion behind a blast wave [45,46] and requires other Figure 8: Ionization-front propagation velocity in an atmospheric millimeter-wave discharge [34,36] and laser discharge [37][38][39]. [44].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Millimeter-wave Discharge Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%