2010
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2009.2032990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Time Synchronization and Localization of an Unknown Node in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Time synchronization and localization are two important issues in wireless sensor networks. Although these two problems share many aspects in common, they are traditionally treated separately. In this paper, we present a unified framework to jointly solve time synchronization and localization problems at the same time. Furthermore, since the accuracy of synchronization and localization is very sensitive to the accuracy of anchor timings and locations, the joint time synchronization and localization pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the proposed least squares (LS) estimator in [22] cannot reach the CRLB accuracy. As a future topic, we would like to derive an efficient closed-form estimator for joint synchronization and source localization in the presence of time skew.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the proposed least squares (LS) estimator in [22] cannot reach the CRLB accuracy. As a future topic, we would like to derive an efficient closed-form estimator for joint synchronization and source localization in the presence of time skew.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, synchronization is usually achieved first via applying one of the available protocoldomain techniques, such as [15][16][17], and the localization task can then be accomplished by executing various algorithms, such as those developed in [7][8][9][12][13][14]. A more recent trend is to perform joint synchronization and source localization owing to their close relationship [18][19][20][21][22]. For this problem, given the statistical model of the TOA measurement noise, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) can be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior knowledge about the node positions in the network is modeled as x i ∼ N (μ i , C i ), where the nominal position μ i and error covariance matrix C i is set for all i [5][6][7]. With C −1 i = 0 we can also model complete ignorance of a node position.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common challenges in location estimation are measurement noise, availability of accurate timing models and anchor uncertainty. Authors in [5][6][7][8] have proposed estimation methods and algorithms which are robust to anchor and timing uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical implementations and the combination of recently proposed methods from both fields are analyzed. In Chapter 6, an overview of simultaneous approaches is presented, with a distinction in centralized and distributed computation [1,19,26,35,36,37,75,89,124,129,137,138,139,141,143,144]. In this review we provide a comprehensive orientation in this novel topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%