2018
DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2018.1437228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint spectral characterization of photon-pair sources

Abstract: The ability to determine the joint spectral properties of photon pairs produced by the processes of spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) and spontaneous four wave mixing (SFWM) is crucial for guaranteeing the usability of heralded single photons and polarization-entangled pairs for multi-photon protocols. In this paper, we compare six different techniques that yield either a characterization of the joint spectral intensity or of the closely-related purity of heralded single photons. These six technique… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(d), we fit the profile with Gaussian shape and obtain the two-photon frequency sum uncertainty ∆(ω as + ω s ) = 2π × (161.78 ± 6.87) kHz. Therefore we estimate the Schmidt number of our biphoton source to be K = 1/ 1 − 1/ 1 + ∆(ω as + ω s )/∆ω s/as 2 2 = 8.03, which confirms the entanglement in frequency domain while a speparable qunatum state takes K = 1 [28]. Combining the result from the previous temporal measurement, we get the joint frequency-time uncertainty product ∆(ω s + ω as )∆(t as − t s ) = 0.063 ± 0.0044,…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…3(d), we fit the profile with Gaussian shape and obtain the two-photon frequency sum uncertainty ∆(ω as + ω s ) = 2π × (161.78 ± 6.87) kHz. Therefore we estimate the Schmidt number of our biphoton source to be K = 1/ 1 − 1/ 1 + ∆(ω as + ω s )/∆ω s/as 2 2 = 8.03, which confirms the entanglement in frequency domain while a speparable qunatum state takes K = 1 [28]. Combining the result from the previous temporal measurement, we get the joint frequency-time uncertainty product ∆(ω s + ω as )∆(t as − t s ) = 0.063 ± 0.0044,…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Further tailoring of the crystal's nonlinearity profile [123][124][125] provides photons that are fully uncorrelated in their spectrum 126,127 , completely removing the need for lossy spectral filtering. Investigation of the performance and limitations of periodically poled SPDC sources continues [128][129][130][131] and even tools for complete SPDC optimization are now available 132 .…”
Section: B Generating a Photonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We substantiate our results by comparing the measured phasematching in the fiber to a theoretical model of the spectral properties of the cross polarized four wave mixing (XFWM) process. The source is further characterized through the measurements of second order coherence and joint spectral intensity using stimulated emission tomography (SET) [39]. We also characterize the inhomogenities in the batch of the fiber using the SET technique and explore the possibility of building multiple identical single photon sources using it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%