2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.010509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Energy-Time Entanglement of Narrow-Band Biphotons

Abstract: We report the direct characterization of energy-time entanglement of narrowband biphotons produced from spontaneous four-wave mixing in cold atoms. The Stokes and anti-Stokes two-photon temporal correlation is measured by single-photon counters with nano second temporal resolution, and their joint spectrum is determined by using a narrow linewidth optical cavity. The energy-time entanglement is verified by the joint frequency-time uncertainty product of 0.063 ± 0.0044, which does not only violate the separabil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy‐time‐entangled biphoton have been studied. [ 8–12 ] In cold atomic systems, by using photon–atom interfaces that match an atomic transition, entangled photon pairs with narrow bands, long coherence times, and high detection rates can be generated by spontaneous four‐wave mixing (SFWM) processes. [ 13,14 ] Furthermore, by analyzing the linear and nonlinear susceptibilities of SFWM, several attractive properties of entangled photon pairs have been obtained, including Rabi oscillations [ 10 ] and Sommerfeld–Brillouin optical precursors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy‐time‐entangled biphoton have been studied. [ 8–12 ] In cold atomic systems, by using photon–atom interfaces that match an atomic transition, entangled photon pairs with narrow bands, long coherence times, and high detection rates can be generated by spontaneous four‐wave mixing (SFWM) processes. [ 13,14 ] Furthermore, by analyzing the linear and nonlinear susceptibilities of SFWM, several attractive properties of entangled photon pairs have been obtained, including Rabi oscillations [ 10 ] and Sommerfeld–Brillouin optical precursors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, several studies have used EPR-correlations measurements in the position-momentum variables in order to demonstrate position-momentum entanglement [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. EPRcorrelation measurements have also been used as witnesses of entanglement in many other continuous variables including time-energy [12][13][14], angle-orbital angular momentum (OAM) [15], radial position-radial momentum [16], and quadrature phase-amplitude [17]. More recently, even in entangled systems not consisting of photons, EPR-correlations measurements have become important tools for witnessing continuous-variable entanglement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is very important to have a more accurate tech-nique for measuring EPR-correlations. In the past few years, many schemes with increased accuracy have been demonstrated [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, all these methods involve coincidence detection, implemented either by using two scanning single-photon detectors [4], or two scanning slits [5,6], or array of single-photon detectors [7,8], or EM-CCD cameras [9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) is one of most widely used methods for generating entangled photons, in which a pump photon at a higher frequency interacts with a nonlinear crystal and produces two separate photons at lower frequencies called the signal and idler photons. The entanglement of down-converted photons has been extensively studied in the discrete finite-dimensional bases such as polarization [9], time-bin [10,11], and orbital angular momentum (OAM) [12,13] as well as in the continuous-variable bases such as position-momentum [14][15][16], angle-OAM [17], radial position-radial momentum [18], time-energy [19][20][21]. Although there are several ways of quantifying two-photon entanglement in two-dimensional bases [22], there is no quantifier for more than two-dimensional bases and continuous-variable bases, in which cases one can talk only in terms of entanglement certifiers [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%