2011
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2010.120310.091430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Pricing and Power Allocation for Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks with Stackelberg Game Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, when = 0, the critical rate threshold (which is characterized in Proposition 1) is zero according to eq. (22). Correspondingly, the interferencecap 0 at each AP is also zero, meaning that the SUs' access is completely forbidden.…”
Section: Revenue Sharing In the Top Layer Via A Nashmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, when = 0, the critical rate threshold (which is characterized in Proposition 1) is zero according to eq. (22). Correspondingly, the interferencecap 0 at each AP is also zero, meaning that the SUs' access is completely forbidden.…”
Section: Revenue Sharing In the Top Layer Via A Nashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides leasing the idle resource to the SUs in an interference-free manner, the PUs can also allow concurrent transmission of the SUs and then charge the suffered interference from them. Related papers [19]- [22] investigated the charging of SUs' interference to optimize the revenue of PU. Specifically, in [19], [20], the PU aimed at maximizing its revenue by charging the SUs' interference, which was subject to a fixed interference-cap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ref. [8], the authors proposed a joint-pricing and power allocation scheme for the CRNs. We proposed a novel price-based power control algorithm based on convex optimization to maximize the revenue of the CDMA based CRNs in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Game theory is an effective tool for resource allocation in multiuser communication systems, which has been applied to CRNs, and [1] summarized the advance of game theory for CRNs. Recently, Stackelberg game has been formulated for resource allocation which addresses the relationship between PUs and SUs in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In these two-tier femtocell networks, the PUs were served by the mobile operators, whereas the SUs are deployed by indoor users for their own interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%