2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint forest management in India: An attitudinal analysis of stakeholders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although strict natural resource conservation in the past has succeeded in preserving such resources in some cases, in many others it has created confl icts between local communities and public institutions charged with conservation (Rishi 2007). Participatory management was initiated to avoid these confl icts and promote sustainable management of natural resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although strict natural resource conservation in the past has succeeded in preserving such resources in some cases, in many others it has created confl icts between local communities and public institutions charged with conservation (Rishi 2007). Participatory management was initiated to avoid these confl icts and promote sustainable management of natural resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the goal to alleviate increasingly emerging conflicts between multiple actors over the forest use rights (Rishi 2007), India introduced the concept of participatory management in its National Forest Policy (Government of India 1988). The Joint Forest Management guidelines define how local communities could be involved in Forest Management outside protected areas (Government of India 1990).…”
Section: Forest Policy In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our multivariate analysis also showed that participation in forest management groups is significantly associated with male individuals. Participation has been seen as a panacea for resolution of conflicts between different forest users (Rishi 2007) and for negotiating the access to resources. However, we found participation negatively associated to the attitudes toward the forest and its official stewards.…”
Section: Reserved Forests and Participation In Forest Management Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social limitations are placed on women in male dominated forest villages that remain rooted in traditional culture, which played an important role in the outcome of our questionnaire iForest (2014) (Öztürk et al 2010, Barli et al 2006, Rishi 2007. Rural area socio-economic development can be ensured only by equal participation of men and women (Külekçi et al 2012).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%