2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2819690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Computation Offloading and Resource Allocation Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks With Mobile Edge Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline algorithm QA, the MUMTO algorithm, the proposed Neural-ICFMO algorithm, and the Neural-ICO algorithm are simulated when the number of IoT devices N is varied from 2 to 45. From Fig.4, it can be observed that the proposed Neural-ICFMO algorithm constantly outperforms the other three algorithms in terms of the weighted sum of delay and power consumption, which is the optimization objective as given in (9) for both the Neural-ICFMO and Neural-ICO algorithms. The performance of the QA and the MUMTO algorithms are quite similar, and the performance improvements of the proposed Neural-ICFMO algorithm as well as the Neural-ICO algorithm over these two algorithms increase with the increasing IoT device number.…”
Section: A Performance Vs Varying Iot Device Numbersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline algorithm QA, the MUMTO algorithm, the proposed Neural-ICFMO algorithm, and the Neural-ICO algorithm are simulated when the number of IoT devices N is varied from 2 to 45. From Fig.4, it can be observed that the proposed Neural-ICFMO algorithm constantly outperforms the other three algorithms in terms of the weighted sum of delay and power consumption, which is the optimization objective as given in (9) for both the Neural-ICFMO and Neural-ICO algorithms. The performance of the QA and the MUMTO algorithms are quite similar, and the performance improvements of the proposed Neural-ICFMO algorithm as well as the Neural-ICO algorithm over these two algorithms increase with the increasing IoT device number.…”
Section: A Performance Vs Varying Iot Device Numbersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From (9) and using Little's Law to derive the delay, we can derive the expression of c(s k , π(s k )) as below:…”
Section: E Reward Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Haber et al [24] jointed optimization of computational cost and devices energy for task offloading in multi-tier edge-clouds while respecting the devices' latency requirement. In [26], the authors proposed a jointly optimization policy in heterogeneous networks in order to minimize the cost of system respect to the energy consumption, computation and transmission cost. The authors of [37] investigated the task allocation problem in MEC environment with mmWave technology.…”
Section: Joint Computation Offloading and Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As wireless channel conditions of UEs have significant differences, the communication resource allocation and computational resource allocation can improve communication and computing efficiency, respectively. Some works addressed the joint allocation of radio and server resource allocation algorithms in various MEC systems [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The joint computation and communication resources can balance the delay cost and computation cost according to the UEs' servicing delay and energy cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of MEC technology, MEC caching is used in many applications with strict delay requirements. A joint optimization scheme was proposed in wireless cellular networks with mobile edge computing, taking into consideration computation offloading decision, physical spectrum resource allocation, MEC computation resource allocation, and content caching strategy [8]. Literature [9] proposed a storage resource allocation scheme of the MEC server taking each BS traffic load into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%