2018
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1424033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Clustering With Correlated Variables

Abstract: Traditional clustering methods focus on grouping subjects or (dependent) variables assuming independence between the variables. Clusters formed through these approaches can potentially lack homogeneity. This article proposes a joint clustering method by which both variables and subjects are clustered. In each joint cluster (in general composed of a subset of variables and a subset of subjects), there exists a unique association between dependent variables and covariates of interest. To this end, a Bayesian met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high homogeneity can help the clustering model to match each cluster to each type of adversarial example. Therefore, there are several possible ways to improve the multi-label classification performance of the proposed method: (1) Designing a denoising method specialized for the extraction of adversarial perturbation, rather than the simple application of general denoising techniques, i.e., binary filter and median filter; (2) Applying techniques to improve the Homogeneity such as multi-stage clustering [ 32 , 33 ], growing self-organizing maps [ 34 ], and the fractional derivatives [ 35 ]. We will leave those kinds of improvements for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high homogeneity can help the clustering model to match each cluster to each type of adversarial example. Therefore, there are several possible ways to improve the multi-label classification performance of the proposed method: (1) Designing a denoising method specialized for the extraction of adversarial perturbation, rather than the simple application of general denoising techniques, i.e., binary filter and median filter; (2) Applying techniques to improve the Homogeneity such as multi-stage clustering [ 32 , 33 ], growing self-organizing maps [ 34 ], and the fractional derivatives [ 35 ]. We will leave those kinds of improvements for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it might be beneficial to use oblique rotation, as the lack of correlation between factors, especially those related to quite similar psychological constructs, should not be assumed, an orthogonal (varimax) approach was used instead. The reason behind such a solution was that in the next stage of the procedure obtained factors would be used in cluster analysis, and therefore it would be undesirable if they were not independent (although several solutions for clustering based on correlated variables exist; see, e.g., in [65]). Factors scores were calculated using a method proposed by ten Berge et al [66].…”
Section: Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%