2022
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2021.3063733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Beamforming Coordination and User Selection for CoMP-Enabled NR-U Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the performance evaluation, a JT-CoMP is enabled at system-level simulation. The UE downlink model of the Vienna 5G simulation [35] is extended by the inter-and intrasite functionalities supported by a timer for synchronization that is implemented in Algorithm 1. The simulator runtime with the conventional and contributed models was observed, and results were achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the performance evaluation, a JT-CoMP is enabled at system-level simulation. The UE downlink model of the Vienna 5G simulation [35] is extended by the inter-and intrasite functionalities supported by a timer for synchronization that is implemented in Algorithm 1. The simulator runtime with the conventional and contributed models was observed, and results were achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that, higher fairness index in intersite means that, the system attempts to maintain the UE throughput similar for all the IoT nodes in the network regardless of their locations relative to eNB and received SINR [33][34][35]. According to the fairness index for intraand intersites, a higher number of users gives less fairness index in the two cases of intersite and intrasite CoMP, because the competition between users becomes tenser.…”
Section: Ue Wideband Sinrmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note that the objective function of problem ( 13) is an upper boundary of the objective function of problem ( 9), while the feasible set of problem ( 13) is a subset of the feasible set of problem (9). Consequently, the solution obtained via problem ( 13) is an upper boundary of problem (9).…”
Section: Design Of Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its optimization objective function was maximizing user rate with allowable transmission power constraint and a 0 − 1 diagonal digital precoding matrix, but without considering the demand of minimum rate of each user. The authors of [9] considered the joint coordinated BF and US for coordinated multi-point enabled new radio in unlicensed spectrum networks, with also aiming at maximizing the throughput instead of considering the rate demand for each user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting, in the FP techniques [20], [27], [28], all non-convex constraints are approximated with the sequence of convex subset, and the underlying convex subproblem is then iteratively solved until the convergence of objective function to a local solution. The FP quadratic transform based solutions have been widely used in many applications, e.g., power control, energy efficiency, and multi-antenna interference coordination [20], [27], [28]. For example, the SINR relaxation via FP techniques is provided for downlink in [20, Section IV], [28, Section III] and for uplink in [27, Section V], assuming perfect CSI and no blockages.…”
Section: Iterative Algorithms For Problem (16)mentioning
confidence: 99%