2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2494963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Search Behavior over the Business Cycle

Abstract: We create a novel measure of job search effort starting in 1994 by exploiting the overlap between the Current Population Survey and the American Time Use Survey. We examine the cyclical behavior of aggregate job search effort using time series and cross-state variation and find that it is countercyclical. About half of the countercyclical movement is explained by a cyclical shift in the observable characteristics of the unemployed. Individual responses to labor market conditions and drops in wealth are importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
67
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…34 For the model with ex ante heterogeneity, we assume that there are two types of workers, a low-x and a high-x type. We calibrate the x for each type by setting it to x low = −σ x and x high = −σ x , where σ x is chosen to match the standard deviation of residual wage offers that control for unobserved worker and job characteristics.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 For the model with ex ante heterogeneity, we assume that there are two types of workers, a low-x and a high-x type. We calibrate the x for each type by setting it to x low = −σ x and x high = −σ x , where σ x is chosen to match the standard deviation of residual wage offers that control for unobserved worker and job characteristics.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukoyama et al (2014) combine information from the CPS data and the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) and obtain similar results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore the matching probability for a worker is m(θ), where θ = v s , and that of a firm is 11 We do not include the possibility of endogenous search behavior by the unemployed (only on-the-job) for two reasons: First, the empirical studies on how search intensity of the unemployed varies over the cycle are inconclusive. There is evidence on both counter-cyclical search intensity (Mukoyama, Patterson, and Sahin (2014)) and pro-cyclical search intensity (Schwartz (2014)). Second, in our model even if we introduced endogenous search intensity of the unemployed, they would always (independent of the business cycle) choose a unique level of search intensity because, due to sequential auction wage setting with constant value of unemployment, the gains for the unemployed from search are constant.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%