2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013367224860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Height of N. dombeyi seedlings was not affected by the use of tree shelters neither in the xeric site, and nor in the mesic site, at least until the second growing season (prior to the browsing effect). This result contrasted with those of several hardwood (Davies 1985;Tuley 1985;Gillespie et al 1996;Bendfeldt et al 2001;McCreary and Tecklin 2001;Dorji et al 2020) and conifer species (Ward et al 2000;Jacobs 2011), which had shown a pronounced positive impact on height with the use of tree shelters. It seems that our results agree with those of the authors who indicate that the net effect of tree shelters on plant growth appeared to be site-and/or species-dependent (Frearson and Weiss 1987;Potter 1988;Burger et al 1992;Buresti and Sestini 1994;Ward and Stephens 1995;West et al 1999;Ponder 2003;Famiani et al 2007;Puértolas et al 2010;Oliet and Jacobs 2007;Piñeiro et al 2013).…”
Section: Tree Shelters and Neighboring Vegetation Effects On Growthcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Height of N. dombeyi seedlings was not affected by the use of tree shelters neither in the xeric site, and nor in the mesic site, at least until the second growing season (prior to the browsing effect). This result contrasted with those of several hardwood (Davies 1985;Tuley 1985;Gillespie et al 1996;Bendfeldt et al 2001;McCreary and Tecklin 2001;Dorji et al 2020) and conifer species (Ward et al 2000;Jacobs 2011), which had shown a pronounced positive impact on height with the use of tree shelters. It seems that our results agree with those of the authors who indicate that the net effect of tree shelters on plant growth appeared to be site-and/or species-dependent (Frearson and Weiss 1987;Potter 1988;Burger et al 1992;Buresti and Sestini 1994;Ward and Stephens 1995;West et al 1999;Ponder 2003;Famiani et al 2007;Puértolas et al 2010;Oliet and Jacobs 2007;Piñeiro et al 2013).…”
Section: Tree Shelters and Neighboring Vegetation Effects On Growthcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In a study on deer browsing in Connecticut, USA, Ward and Stephens [40] found that the height of black walnut was lower after three years of growth (than at planting) for those seedlings without shelters due to heavy browsing. Bendfelt et al [17] noted that in their study with black walnut and honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) in Virginia, deer tended to rub rather than browse the black walnut (whereas they browsed honeylocust). USFS [41] says of black walnut, "Deer browse on buds and rub antlers against young trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our survival numbers for walnut seeds without shelter are comparable to those that have been found for chestnuts from seed with shelters planted on surface mine sites. Outside of surface-mined lands, Bendfelt et al [17] looked at bare-root black walnut seedlings in an agroforestry setting with and without the same kind of shelters we used (as well as a shorter poultry wire shelter) in Virginia, USA, and found no shelter effect as survival was near 100% in all treatments for the first three growing seasons included in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such species may be advantageous as they have relatively fast growth rates, open canopies, and phenologies that reduce competition with the growth of cool-season forages. Their root systems can stabilize soil and improve nutrient capture and recycling, their canopies provide shade to animals and produce nuts and fodder (e.g., leaves and edible seed pods), and their timber has market value or potential for numerous farm uses (Bendfeldt et al 2001). While the greater complexity of the silvopastures versus open pasture systems suggests they could significantly enhance soil health, little is known regarding the effects of silvopastoral management on soil health parameters-specifically when integrating black walnut and honeylocust trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%