Untitled

Villeneuve, Paul J.; Johnson, Kenneth C.; Kreiger, Nancy; Mao, Yang

doi:10.1023/a:1008958103865

Cited by 166 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, there was a suggestion of a modest increased risk of metastatic prostate cancer with increasing intake of cooked processed meats, but this relationship was attenuated after adjustment for confounders. The literature regarding red meat consumption and prostate cancer in studies of primarily White men has been inconsistent, reporting null (5, 6, 18-21) or positive (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) associations for different types of red meat consumption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meat Consumption among Black and White Men and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort

Rodríguez

McCullough

Mondul

et al. 2006

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &Amp; Prevention

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous epidemiologic studies have suggested that intake of red meat may be associated with increased risk of prostate cancer. Few studies, however, have examined these associations by race. We examined intake of red meat, processed meat, and poultry in relation to incident prostate cancer among Black and White men in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Participants in the study completed a detailed questionnaire on diet, medical history, and lifestyle in 1992 to 1993. After excluding men with a history of cancer and incomplete dietary information, 692 Black and 64,856 White men were included in the cohort. During follow-up through August 31, 2001, we documented 85 and 5,028 cases of incident prostate cancer among Black and White men, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). No measure of meat consumption was associated with risk of prostate cancer among White men. Among Black men, total red meat intake (processed plus unprocessed red meat) was associated with higher risk of prostate cancer (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.2 for highest versus lowest quartile; P trend = 0.05); this increase in risk was mainly due to risk associated with consumption of cooked processed meats (sausages, bacon, and hot dogs; RR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3 for highest versus lowest quartile; P trend = 0.008). This study suggests that high consumption of cooked processed meats may contribute to prostate cancer risk among Black men in the United States. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(2):211 -6)

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meat Consumption among Black and White Men and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort

Rodríguez

McCullough

Mondul

et al. 2006

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &Amp; Prevention

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most but not all studies conducted in Western populations found no significant association between black tea and prostate cancer risk. The null-finding studies included three cohort studies conducted in the UK [7,44] and Canada [45], and three casecontrol studies conducted in the US [46], Canada [47], and (2) area/center, (3) education, (4) smoking, (5) coffee, (6) body size, (7) oral contraceptives, (8) parity, (9) alcohol, (10) energy. c) Cancer controls were used.…”

Section: Prostate Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

Tea, hormone‐related cancers and endogenous hormone levels

2006

Molecular Nutrition Food Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tea is one of the most popular beverages consumed around the world, second only to water. There has been substantial interest in the potential role of tea in cancer prevention, particularly in respiratory and gastrointestinal tract cancers. Recent epidemiological data have linked tea intake to reduced risk of hormone-related cancers, including breast, ovarian and prostate cancers. Based on sparse data, there is suggestion that tea intake may influence circulating hormone levels, providing a plausible mechanism whereby tea intake may influence risk of hormone-related cancers. The major objectives of this paper are to review the epidemiological evidence on tea and risk of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers as well as the human and non-human studies on tea and circulating hormone levels. We pay special attention to some of the limitations of the human studies and discuss future research needs.

show abstract

“…Searching PubMed, Medline, and Embase yielded 348 papers, 30 of which met the inclusion criteria for study selection (two systematic reviews, 8,9 two meta-analyses, 6,10 five literature reviews, 2,4,5,11,12 and 21 single-study papers 3,13-32 ) (Fig. 1).…”

Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 This is 0.2 greater than the OR of the black population, who more commonly develop prostate cancer. 5,6 Since the ORs reported were adjusted to the aforementioned risk factors, including income and certain foods, this indicates a shift in focus towards environmental factors that potentially attribute to the development of prostate cancer in Canada. 6 Although an OR >1.0 reflects an increased chance of Aboriginals developing prostate cancer compared to non-Aboriginals, it does not indicate elevated incidence, as the ORs are calculated in the context of risk factor exposure and not cancer diagnosis.…”

Section: Kidney Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Epidemiology of prostate and kidney cancer in the Aboriginal population of Canada: A systematic review

Wong

Kapoor

2017

CUAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Prostate and kidney cancer rates in the Aboriginal population of Canada is a growing issue. Methods: A systematic review of prostate and kidney cancer epidemiology in the Aboriginal population of Canada was performed with international comparison and evaluation of present epidemiological disparities. PubMed, Medline, and Embase (from January 1946 to June 2016), relevant government-published reports, and the websites of organizations contributing to prostate or kidney cancer guidelines were searched. We included studies that informed any of the three epidemiological questions this review is focused on answering. Results: Two systematic reviews, two meta-analyses, five literature reviews, and 21 single-study papers were included. The incidence and mortality rates of kidney cancer were elevated among Canadian Aboriginals when compared to the provincial or national population and to several international regions. No studies reported data on survival. Prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates were lower in Aboriginals provincially, nationally, and internationally, with incidence and survival reaching statistical significance. Elevated rate of risk factors for kidney cancer was a significant finding among Canadian Aboriginals. Aboriginals were screened for prostate cancer less than the general Canadian population, a trend also observed in the U.S. Conclusions:The elevated incidence and mortality of kidney cancer among Canadian Aboriginals is most likely attributable to the rise in lifestyle-based risk factors. Two correlations concerning prostate cancer are made. However, due to temporal and regional disparities in data, further investigation is required to elucidate these observations. IntroductionIn Canada, the term "Aboriginal" is used to describe individuals who identify as First Nations (North American Indian), Métis, or Inuk (Inuit).1 According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 1 400 685 Canadians identified as being Aboriginal, comprising 4.3% of the Canadian population.1 Provincially, Ontario has the largest population of Aboriginal people in Canada, with 301 425 Aboriginal residents.1 Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among males in Canada, while kidney cancer ranks sixth. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common morphology of kidney cancer, accounting for 80% of cases. 2Prostate and kidney cancer among Aboriginals of Canada is of particular concern due to the lack of current data on screening, treatment, and surveillance. [3][4][5][6] There are three points of interest for comparison in this review:1. Incidence, mortality, and survival rates 2. Risk factor prevalence 3. Screening guidelines The goal of this review is to answer three epidemiological questions:1. How do Aboriginals of Canada compare provincially, nationally, and internationally with regards to prostate and kidney cancer incidence, mortality, and survival? 2. What risk factor is the most contributory to the development of prostate and kidney cancer among Aboriginals of Canad...

show abstract

Untitled

Abstract: Our analyses are limited by the absence of data related to tumor severity and screening history. Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between behavioral risk factors and prostate cancer screening practices.

Cited by 166 publications

References 39 publications

Meat Consumption among Black and White Men and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort

Meat Consumption among Black and White Men and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort

Tea, hormone‐related cancers and endogenous hormone levels

Epidemiology of prostate and kidney cancer in the Aboriginal population of Canada: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About