1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007760327375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is hardly surprising since proportionality is generally rejected in the included studies in the primary data. A significant relationship between the mortality risk reduction and VSL was also more formally established in the global meta-analysis of VSL estimates (including two of the studies surveyed in this paper) [2] as well as in a number of other previous empirical studies [18]. The problem with scale insensitivity is of course also potentially important for the VSL estimates included in Table 2 in general, i.e.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is hardly surprising since proportionality is generally rejected in the included studies in the primary data. A significant relationship between the mortality risk reduction and VSL was also more formally established in the global meta-analysis of VSL estimates (including two of the studies surveyed in this paper) [2] as well as in a number of other previous empirical studies [18]. The problem with scale insensitivity is of course also potentially important for the VSL estimates included in Table 2 in general, i.e.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It has been shown that VSL studies, especially when mortality risk reductions are very small, tend to suffer from scale insensitivity, i.e. WTP does not increase proportionally or "near-proportionally" with the risk reduction [18].…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result points to an inadequate sensitivity in WTP to scope (scope bias), which is often reported in contingent valuation studies and stated preference approaches in general (e.g., [31, 32]). Several studies regarding WTP per QALY have found evidence of scope bias [3, 4, 7, 8, 15], and a recent meta-analysis estimate a 64% decrease in WTP-Q per unit larger QALY change [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, existing studies which evaluate the effect of age on VSLs provided contradictory results. It has been reported that VSL for children may be greater or at least equal comparing to VSL calculated for adults (Blomquist 2004), or that VSL could increase Lee et al 1997) or decrease with age (Hammitt and Graham 1999;Corso et al 2001;Krupnick et al 2002). We decide to consider this higher estimator used by EPA in most benefit-cost analysis to underline the fact that the very rare studies aiming to approximate parental WTP for child risk reduction have obtained the estimators of VSL for children that exceeded most of VSL figures reported in the literature for adults (Jenkins et al 2001).…”
Section: Estimated Costs Of Pertussis Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%