Jealousy, intimate abusiveness, and intrusiveness

Dutton, Donald G.; Ginkel, Cynthia van; Landolt, Monica A.

doi:10.1007/bf02333425

Cited by 77 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research has consistently found jealousy to be significantly related to IPV Barnett et al, 1995;Dutton, van Ginkel, & Landolt, 1996;Fenton & Rathus, 2010;Puente & Cohen, 2003;Sugarman & Hotaling, 1989;Wilson & Daly, 1998). The predictive strength of jealousy was supported in this research, even when differentiation of self was added to the analysis.…”

Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

“…The relationship between jealousy and IPV has been examined in a number of studies (Babcock, Costa, & Green, 2004;Barnett, Martinez, & Bluestein, 1995;Hannawa, Spitzberg, Wiering, & Teranishi, 2006;Wilson & Daly, 1998; with jealousy consistently being significantly related to IPV Barnett et al, 1995;Dutton, van Ginkel, & Landolt, 1996;Fenton & Rathus, 2010;Puente & Cohen, 2003;Sugarman & Hotaling, 1989;Wilson & Daly, 1998). Jealousy represents intense emotions that may lead to the inability for batterers with low levels of differentiation to employ a response that is free of violence.…”

Section: Jealousy and Ipvmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differentiation and Intimate Partner Violence

Likcani

2017

The American Journal of Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Jealousy and Ipvmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differentiation and Intimate Partner Violence

Likcani

2017

The American Journal of Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this vein, jealousy may be fulfilling its evolutionary past as an emotion complex adapted to mate guarding and pair bonding (Geary, Rumsey, Bow-Thomas, & Hoard, 1995;Keltner & Anderson, 2000). Yet, as functional as jealousy may be, it clearly does have a darker side as a significant cause of aggression and violence (Barnett, Martinez, & Bluestein, 1995;Dutton, van Ginkel, & Landolt, 1996). As such, jealousy may reflect a potent double-edged sword of relational emotions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tickling the monster: Jealousy induction in relationships

Fleischmann

Spitzberg

Andersen

et al. 2005

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study develops a general model of jealousy induction in romantic relationships. The model posits that the goals of jealousy induction predict jealousy-induction tactics, which in turn predict partner responses to jealousy, which in turn predict strategic outcomes. Measures were developed for this study to assess jealousy-induction goals, induction tactics, and strategic outcome (i.e., tactical efficacy). Exploratory factor analysis revealed two types of jealousy-induction goals (i.e., relational rewards, relational revenge), three types of jealousy-induction tactics (i.e., relational distancing, flirtation façade, relational alternatives), and three types of partner response to jealousy (i.e., aggressive, withdrawal, relational compensation). Using relational outcome variables representing tactical efficacy and relational improvement, structural equation modeling demonstrated partial support for the model, but with modifications to several components. Specifically, the jealousy responses did not function as a single latent variable, and were treated as individual indicators. Furthermore, the final model did not fit well statistically, but did fit very well according to the descriptive indices, for both males and females. The model provides a general framework for understanding strategic jealousy induction, and suggests a variety of paths for future work elucidating the role of jealousy in relational development and maintenance.

show abstract

“…Na clínica, aparece como o tema central de dificuldades no relacionamento amoroso e sexual (Marks & de Silva, 1991;White & Mullen, 1989), como principal sintoma do Transtorno delirante -Tipo ciumento (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2003), associado a outros transtornos, como o Obsessivo-Compulsivo (Torres, Ramos-Cerqueira, & Dias, 1999) e o Borderline (Dutton, van Ginkel, & Landolt, 1996) ou a traços psicológicos, como o neuroticismo (Carvalho, Bueno, & Kebleris, 2008) e a baixa autoestima (DeSteno, Valdesolo, & Bartlett, 2006). Pesquisas mostram, ainda, sua estreita relação com comportamentos violentos, especialmente contra a mulher (Holtzworth-Munroe, Stuart, & Hutchinson, 1997;Mullen, 1995), e com estresse no trabalho (Vecchio, 2000), tornando-o também um tema de interesse para as áreas de psicologia social, criminal e do trabalho, entre outras.…”

unclassified

Um estudo de revisão do Inventário de Ciúme Romântico (ICR)

Bueno¹,

Carvalho²

2012

Psicol. Reflex. Crit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoO objetivo deste estudo foi revisar o Inventário de Ciúme Romântico, na tentativa de obter um instrumento com melhores propriedades psicométricas. O instrumento revisado foi aplicado a 201 universitários de ambos os sexos. Uma análise fatorial exploratória revelou uma estrutura primária com seis fatores: Não Contato com o Parceiro, Contato Parceiro-Rival, Agressão ao Parceiro, Agressão ao Rival, Autoestima e Investigação. Uma análise fatorial de segunda ordem indicou a unidimensionalidade dos seis fatores primários. A fidedignidade (α) variou de 0,55 (Investigação) a 0,91 (Fator Geral). Portanto, a escala apresenta validade baseada na estrutura interna, mas a fidedignidade sofreu influência do baixo número de itens em alguns fatores. Entretanto, a escala pode ser recomendada para utilização em pesquisas, especialmente para avaliação global do ciúme romântico. Palavras-chave: Avaliação psicológica, psicometria, ciúme. AbstractThe aim of this study was to review the Romantic Jealousy Inventory in an attempt to obtain an instrument with better psychometric properties. The reviewed instrument was administered to 201 undergraduate students of both sexes. An exploratory factor analysis revealed a primary structure with six factors: NonContact with Partner, Partner-Rival Contact, Partner Assault, Rival Assault, Self-Esteem and Investigation. A second-order factor analysis indicated the unidimensionality of the six primary factors. Reliability (α) ranged from .55 (Investigation) to .91 (General Factor). Therefore, the scale presents validity based on internal structure, but reliability was influenced by the low number of items in some factors. However, the scale may be recommended to be used in research, especially for an overall assessment of romantic jealousy.

show abstract

Jealousy, intimate abusiveness, and intrusiveness

Cited by 77 publications

References 26 publications

Differentiation and Intimate Partner Violence

Differentiation and Intimate Partner Violence

Tickling the monster: Jealousy induction in relationships

Um estudo de revisão do Inventário de Ciúme Romântico (ICR)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About