2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-014-0693-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers

Abstract: BackgroundIn 2007, the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was established to overcome the limitations of the original JOA scoring system developed in 1986. Although this new self-administered questionnaire is a more accurate outcome measure for evaluating patients with low back pain, physicians were unable to as certain the exact status of a patient at a single time point because of a lack of reference values. This study aimed to establish the reference values of JOAB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…JOABPEQ comprises 25 questions across five domains: pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, and psychological disorders. For each domain, the difference between preoperative scores and those at postoperative 1 year (improvement score) was calculated and the effectiveness of the treatment evaluated 5) . According to the subsidence pattern of each segment, the 85 patients were classified as follows: Group E (at least one Segment E), Group S (at least one Segment S), Group ES (both Segments E and S), or Group N (Segment N alone).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JOABPEQ comprises 25 questions across five domains: pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, and psychological disorders. For each domain, the difference between preoperative scores and those at postoperative 1 year (improvement score) was calculated and the effectiveness of the treatment evaluated 5) . According to the subsidence pattern of each segment, the 85 patients were classified as follows: Group E (at least one Segment E), Group S (at least one Segment S), Group ES (both Segments E and S), or Group N (Segment N alone).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical examination can be carried out on these patients, JOABPEQ is a standard measure used in Japan to evaluate the pain in patients by carrying out specific tasks that do not cause harm to them or hurt them in anyway. This method was implemented in 1986 and has been highly recognized throughout the world in assessing low back pain in patients which is a common sign in kidney damage (Hashizume et al, 2015).…”
Section: Chapter 5: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both groups, HRQOL measures included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22; total and four subdomains: activity, appearance, mental, and satisfaction), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) [10] (five subdomains: pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, and psychological disorders). We examined only spinal columnrelated pain by asking patients to indicate the site of pain [11] and excluded pain in the buttocks, hips, knees, and shoulder joints. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Juntendo University Hospital .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%