2005
DOI: 10.1038/435883a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japan's whaling plan under scrutiny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being the most numerous cetacean in the Southern Ocean and the subject of a contentious lethal sampling program, no efforts were made to directly study the underwater behavior of these important predators (Gales et al, 2005). Because of the logistical constraints of working in and around sea ice in a remote environment, the difficulty of approaching whales closely enough for tagging, and the only recent advancement of multi-sensor tag technology, data on Antarctic minke whale behavior remained elusive.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being the most numerous cetacean in the Southern Ocean and the subject of a contentious lethal sampling program, no efforts were made to directly study the underwater behavior of these important predators (Gales et al, 2005). Because of the logistical constraints of working in and around sea ice in a remote environment, the difficulty of approaching whales closely enough for tagging, and the only recent advancement of multi-sensor tag technology, data on Antarctic minke whale behavior remained elusive.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk for Japan is that dependence upon these revenues could drive its quotas for scientific whaling, yet leave the real scientific questions unaddressed." 145 A similar point may be found in Ishii' s recent article arguing that Japan' s real interest lies not in reforming the IWC, but in maintaining the status quo. 146 Through a "counterfactual thought experiment"Atsushi Ishii raises the question of what would happen if the moratorium was lifted?…”
Section: Interpretation Of Article VIII Of the Icrwmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Anti-whaling proponents have long advanced arguments that are sourced to animal welfare and other ethical criteria, viewing whaling as uncivilized, barbaric and cruel [7], as well as citing the ''unscientific'' nature of lethal sampling [8] and the potential dangers surrounding the hunting of some cetacean species whose population structures are still unknown. 4 Currently, Japan is whaling for ''scientific purposes'' in the context of a ''Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic'' (JARPA), and since 1994 in the context of a corresponding program for the Northwest Pacific (JARPN), 5 in accordance with Article VIII.1 of the ICRW, 6 whilst also maintaining small scale coastal whaling, hunting species not subject to the ICRW 7 (Baird's beaked whales and pilot whales).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%