2018
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2016.0193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Despite the earlier age at transplant, the previous urologic operations, and the high incidence of urinary tract infection after renal transplant, graft survival and functions after renal transplant were not significantly different between patients with abnormal and normal bladders over at least the first 10 years. Therefore, it is safe to transplant into abnormal bladders once they have been assessed, reconstructed if necessary, and managed appropriately.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of bladder recycling is that it can predict which defunctionalized bladders would improve after resuming normal cycling [ 22 ]. It is safer to transplant into a normal bladder, but if the bladder is abnormal, the risk of a poor outcome can be minimised by conducting appropriate pretransplant investigations and planning optimal management [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One advantage of bladder recycling is that it can predict which defunctionalized bladders would improve after resuming normal cycling [ 22 ]. It is safer to transplant into a normal bladder, but if the bladder is abnormal, the risk of a poor outcome can be minimised by conducting appropriate pretransplant investigations and planning optimal management [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies support pretransplant bladder evaluation and pretransplant correction of LCB, especially in patients whose bladder dysfunction results from urological etiologies [ 4 6 ]. Moreover, a study report that LCB in kidney transplant patients leads to decrease graft survival and increase risk of complications such as urinary tract infection [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В то же время, по данным некоторых авторов, нарушенная функция мочевого пузыря, сопровождающаяся уменьшением его емкости, повышенным внутрипузырным давлением и снижением комплаентности существенно не сказывается в негативную сторону на результатах ТП при сроках наблюдения до 10 лет [69]. Функционирование трансплантата в группах реципиентов почки с дисфункцией мочевого пузыря и нормально функционирующим органом в течение 1, 3 и 5 лет составляло 90%, 88% и 82% в группе с дисфункцией мочевого пузыря и 97%, 91% и 87% в группе без дисфункции органа соответственно.…”
Section: Review Articles and Lecturesunclassified
“…В то же время по данным некоторых авторов нарушенная функция мочевого пузыря, сопрово-ждающаяся уменьшением его емкости, повышенным внутрипузырным давлением и снижением комплаентности, существенно не сказывается или не сказывается в значительной степени негативно на результатах трансплантации почки при сроках наблюдения до 10 лет [10].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified