2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

J-PAS: forecasts on interacting dark energy from baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions

Abstract: We estimate the constraining power of J-PAS for parameters of an interacting dark energy cosmology. The survey is expected to map several millions of luminous red galaxies, emission line galaxies and quasars in an area of thousands of square degrees in the northern sky with precise photometric redshift measurements. Forecasts for the DESI and Euclid surveys are also evaluated and compared to J-PAS. With the Fisher matrix approach, we find that J-PAS can place constraints on the interaction parameter comparable… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(67 reference statements)
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous results, together with the completeness shown in Fig. 16, suggest that J-PAS will be able to perform very well in the redshift range of 0.2 < z < 0.6 (Resco et al 2020;Costa et al 2019).…”
Section: Large Scale Structuresupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous results, together with the completeness shown in Fig. 16, suggest that J-PAS will be able to perform very well in the redshift range of 0.2 < z < 0.6 (Resco et al 2020;Costa et al 2019).…”
Section: Large Scale Structuresupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In particular, J-PAS has the potential to provide the most precise determination of the Hubble parameter H(z) and the growth rate f σ 8 (z) at 0.2 ≤ z ≤ 0.6, outperforming past and upcoming surveys in this redshift range. A dedicated forecast analysis can be found in Costa et al (2019), Resco et al (2020), and Resco & Maroto (2020).…”
Section: Large Scale Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is completely different from interacting dark matter-dark energy scenarios [46,[67][68][69], and thus the measurements of f from Eqs. 3.1 and 3.3 should be almost identical at small scales, confirmed by the illustration in Fig.…”
Section: Impacts On the Cmb Tt Spectrum From Dm Decaymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Some efforts have been made to uncover DE's nature using the interaction model eq. 2.1.1 as in [18], [26], [25] and [27].…”
Section: Interaction Models To the Dark Sectormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using eq. 2.1.1, for example, [27] uses the Fisher matrix formalism to constrain ξ parameters in eq. 2.21 through BAO and redshift-space distortion information provided by the J-PAS survey.…”
Section: Interaction Models To the Dark Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%