2018
DOI: 10.1121/1.5065493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative solutions of the array equations for rapid design and analysis of large projector arrays

Abstract: A fast computational method for modeling and simulation of large projector arrays is presented. The method is based on the array equations that account for the acoustic interaction among the projector elements as well as the individual characteristics of each projector. Unlike the existing solution method in which the acoustic interaction must be known a priori in the form of interaction impedance matrix Z, the present method seeks the solution of modified array equations through iterations without explicitly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between our EC analysis and FEA is that the 2-D axis-symmetric finite element model involved a coupled vibration of all components of our basic model ( Figure 2) due to the comparable dimensions in the axial and lateral directions. For thin head mass models that possibly apply a noticeable effect of flexural resonance mode near the fundamental mode, EC models with an additional resonance branch or FEA can be used for higher accuracy [5,6]. Despite the higher accuracy of the FEA compared to the EC model, the results obtained in this study imply that the EC model was advantageous over the FEA in terms of the speed and efficiency of the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between our EC analysis and FEA is that the 2-D axis-symmetric finite element model involved a coupled vibration of all components of our basic model ( Figure 2) due to the comparable dimensions in the axial and lateral directions. For thin head mass models that possibly apply a noticeable effect of flexural resonance mode near the fundamental mode, EC models with an additional resonance branch or FEA can be used for higher accuracy [5,6]. Despite the higher accuracy of the FEA compared to the EC model, the results obtained in this study imply that the EC model was advantageous over the FEA in terms of the speed and efficiency of the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The flexural resonance frequency highly depends on the head mass thickness, as shown in the approximated expression in Equation 3, where c h , t h , D h , and ν h denote the wave speed, thickness, diameter, and Poisson's ratio of the head mass, respectively [1]. The mode coupling with a flexural mode typically lowers the longitudinal resonance frequency (f 2 ) [5,6].…”
Section: Head Mass Thickness Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation