2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2005.1545045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative relaxation of constraints: a framework for improving automated motion planning

Abstract: This paper presents a technique for improving the efficiency of automated motion planners. Motion planning has application in many areas such as robotics, virtual reality systems, computer-aided design, and even computational biology. Although there have been steady advances in motion planning algorithms, especially in randomized approaches such as probabilistic roadmap methods (PRMs) or rapidly-exploring random trees (RRTs), there are still some classes of problems that cannot be solved efficiently using thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, milestones are carried to collision-free space. In Iterative Relaxation of Constraints (IRC) method (Bayazit et al, 2005), first a relaxed version of problem is solved and then this coarse solution is used as a guide to solve original problem iteratively. The strategy of using an approximate solution to obtain a collision-free path is also used in Lazy PRM (Bohlin & Kavraki, 2001) and C-PRM (Song & Amato, 2001).…”
Section: Framework Of the Dynamically Feasible Path Planning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, milestones are carried to collision-free space. In Iterative Relaxation of Constraints (IRC) method (Bayazit et al, 2005), first a relaxed version of problem is solved and then this coarse solution is used as a guide to solve original problem iteratively. The strategy of using an approximate solution to obtain a collision-free path is also used in Lazy PRM (Bohlin & Kavraki, 2001) and C-PRM (Song & Amato, 2001).…”
Section: Framework Of the Dynamically Feasible Path Planning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of these approaches decreases rapidly for chains with many links. To address this issue, researchers have developed several closure configuration generation methods that can be adapted to solve the IK problem, such as the random loop generator [18] and iterative constraint relaxation [19], which have considerably improved performance over earlier methods.…”
Section: A Prior Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical approaches construct explicit geometrical and topological representation of the closure set [4], [9], [13], but are usually inefficient in practice. Practical sampling-based methods [3], [16] usually project the closure set on the subset of parameters, on which the planning is performed [5], [8]. An inverse kinematics solver is used in these approaches as a black box to get the solution back on the configuration space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%