2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9508-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity

Abstract: The Italian version of MOXFQ is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating foot pain and functional status in patients affected by hallux valgus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A relative drawback of the MOXFQ consists of the copyright licence, which is required for any use of the score, with administration fees for any version [52]. Limited validated translations of both instruments have been developed until now [48,53]. The psychometric properties of the quality of life scores, demonstrate the SF-36 meets quality criteria best.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relative drawback of the MOXFQ consists of the copyright licence, which is required for any use of the score, with administration fees for any version [52]. Limited validated translations of both instruments have been developed until now [48,53]. The psychometric properties of the quality of life scores, demonstrate the SF-36 meets quality criteria best.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOXFQ proved to be a reliable and valid patient-reported instrument with acceptable responsiveness in patients with foot and ankle conditions (5). MOXFQ has been translated to different languages (7,8). Persian is the language used in conversations in some countries in the Middle East including Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and parts of Pakistan and Iraq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergent and discriminant validity were tested using the correlation between item and subscale or summary (PCS or MCS) scores with Spearman's correlation coefficient (q) [27,28]. The correlation coefficients between item and subscale or summary score C0.4 were satisfied for convergent validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%