2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It takes three to tango: Leadership and hostility in the service encounter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…George, ; Kaplan, Bradley, Luchman, & Haynes, ; van Kleef, Homan, Beersma, Van Knippenberg, Van Knippenberg, & Damen, ). This was also shown for the effect of leadership behaviour (Dasborough & Ashkanasy, ; Medler‐Liraz & Kark, ; Sy, Cote, & Saavedra, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…George, ; Kaplan, Bradley, Luchman, & Haynes, ; van Kleef, Homan, Beersma, Van Knippenberg, Van Knippenberg, & Damen, ). This was also shown for the effect of leadership behaviour (Dasborough & Ashkanasy, ; Medler‐Liraz & Kark, ; Sy, Cote, & Saavedra, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, in a high-quality LMX relationship, the leaders intend to have more trusted and supportive communications with their followers, and these communications can assist in decreasing the followers’ feeling of loss, frustration and even anger as a result of the frequent interactions with uncivil customers, thus engendering a positive appraisal of customer service (e.g., interpreted as an opportunity of self-challenge) for the followers. Employees with high-quality LMX relationships are more prone to favorably viewing their customers (Medler-Liraz and Kark, 2012). It is thus clear that employees in high-quality LMX relationships are provided with social resources by their supervisors which can mitigate the adverse influence of customer mistreatment to them.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical and conceptual work has suggested that service failure in particular makes employees susceptible to customer mistreatment due to negative customer responses and behaviors (e.g., Medler-Liraz & Kark, 2012;Reynolds & Harris, 2009). For instance, McColl-Kennedy, Patterson, Smith, and Brady (2009) identified customer rage-related emotions and behaviors incited by service failure; they found that retaliatory and rancorous rage were linked with verbal and physical forms of customer mistreatment.…”
Section: Service Encounter Quality and Customer States As Proximal Anmentioning
confidence: 99%