2015
DOI: 10.1108/s1479-355520150000013002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer Mistreatment: A Review of Conceptualizations and a Multilevel Theoretical Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
194
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(258 reference statements)
7
194
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PANAS (Watson et al., ) was used to assess affective state with the time frame changed from “in general” to “currently.” This is because past research demonstrated that affect in the morning might set the tone for one's feelings during the day, likely influencing the resources available for focal tasks and affective reactions to work events (e.g., Beal et al., ; Rothbard & Wilk, ). In addition, we also controlled for self‐report service quality and service job satisfaction at the daily level in this study because service quality could potentially influence customer treatment toward employees (Koopmann, Wang, Liu, & Song, ) and employees’ experienced satisfaction could relate to emotional exhaustion (Martínez‐Iñigo et al., ). Daily service performance was assessed with one item (i.e., “Based on your service performance during the day, how do you rate your service quality today?”) rated by service employees on a seven‐point scale ranging from very poor to very good .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PANAS (Watson et al., ) was used to assess affective state with the time frame changed from “in general” to “currently.” This is because past research demonstrated that affect in the morning might set the tone for one's feelings during the day, likely influencing the resources available for focal tasks and affective reactions to work events (e.g., Beal et al., ; Rothbard & Wilk, ). In addition, we also controlled for self‐report service quality and service job satisfaction at the daily level in this study because service quality could potentially influence customer treatment toward employees (Koopmann, Wang, Liu, & Song, ) and employees’ experienced satisfaction could relate to emotional exhaustion (Martínez‐Iñigo et al., ). Daily service performance was assessed with one item (i.e., “Based on your service performance during the day, how do you rate your service quality today?”) rated by service employees on a seven‐point scale ranging from very poor to very good .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further contribute specifically to the customer mistreatment literature by testing the role of self‐esteem threat—a mechanism that has been postulated by germinal work (e.g., Dormann & Zapf, ; Shao & Skarlicki, ; Skarlicki, van Jaarsveld, & Walker, ) and elaborated in theory‐building (e.g., Amarnani, Bordia, & Restubog, ; Koopmann, Wang, Liu, & Song, ) yet has eluded systematic testing. These scholars have indicated that customer mistreatment may be of significant import for people's sense of self because continual poor treatment from customers is degrading and disrespectful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further contribute specifically to the customer mistreatment literature by testing the role of self-esteem threat-a mechanism that has been postulated by germinal work (e.g., Dormann & Zapf, 2004;Shao & Skarlicki, 2014;Skarlicki, van Jaarsveld, & Walker, 2008) and elaborated in theory-building (e.g., Amarnani, Bordia, & Restubog, 2018;Koopmann, Wang, Liu, & Song, 2015) yet has eluded systematic testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, supervisors and colleagues are examined as possible sources both of support and of aggression. In service-sector organizations, conversely, users have rarely been considered as possible sources of support: the focus has been almost exclusively on the negative side of the relationship with “others.” Thus, disproportionate requests (Dormann and Zapf, 2004; Dudenhöffer and Dormann, 2013, 2015), customer mistreatment (Koopmann et al, 2015), or aggressive behaviors (LeBlanc and Kelloway, 2002; Viotti et al, 2015) have been considered to be factors that decrease job satisfaction and psychological well-being, contribute to developing stress, burnout, and the spiraling of negative exchanges between employees and customers (Groth and Grandey, 2012), and directly or indirectly enhance an employee’s intention to leave an organization (Lee and Ashforth, 1996; Jourdain and Chênevert, 2010). However, when service workers are asked why they have chosen their jobs (Maslach, 1982), they often declare their interest in “dealing with people” (Zimmermann et al, 2011, p. 31), thus implying that the motivational processes among service workers is often based on their interest in building a positive relationship with customers (users, patients, students, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%