2018
DOI: 10.1080/00091383.2018.1510257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It's the Assignments—A Ubiquitous and Inexpensive Strategy to Significantly Improve Higher-Order Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of this rubric is that it effectively captures the movement in Deardorff's () model between the individual/internal level (attitudes) and the external/interaction level (outcomes) by creating a framework to measure the degree to which individuals reflect appropriate attitudes (e.g., curiosity and openness) and act on them (empathy and verbal and nonverbal communication). The VALUE rubrics are widely used by colleges and universities in the United States (see Rhodes, 2009; Sullivan & Drezek McConnell, ) and thus have enormous potential to create common reference points and models in the sea of scholarly literature devoted to culture and intercultural competence.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of this rubric is that it effectively captures the movement in Deardorff's () model between the individual/internal level (attitudes) and the external/interaction level (outcomes) by creating a framework to measure the degree to which individuals reflect appropriate attitudes (e.g., curiosity and openness) and act on them (empathy and verbal and nonverbal communication). The VALUE rubrics are widely used by colleges and universities in the United States (see Rhodes, 2009; Sullivan & Drezek McConnell, ) and thus have enormous potential to create common reference points and models in the sea of scholarly literature devoted to culture and intercultural competence.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sixth, verbal and nonverbal communication, was excluded since we do not include intercultural communicative competence as a programmatic goal at the elementary level. As Barski and Wilkerson–Barker (2019) pointed out, “The VALUE rubrics are widely used by colleges and universities in the United States (see Sullivan & McConnell, 2018) and thus have enormous potential to create common reference points and models in the sea of scholarly literature devoted to culture and intercultural competence” (p. 495). Moreover, the AAC&U also uses Bennett's (2008) definition of IC as “a set of cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills and characteristics that support effective and appropriate interaction in a variety of cultural contexts.” The levels of this rubric are informed in part by Bennett's (1993) developmental model of intercultural sensitivity, which is the foundation of the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI).…”
Section: A Model For Curricular Revision To Support Intercultural Com...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2019 article in the Chronicle of Higher Education, “Assessment is an Enormous Waste of Time,” explained that universities continue to measure “learning”, “But what if learning isn’t the most important element in a college education?” [ 68 ] (p. 3). Recent studies have found little to no evidence that higher education was teaching learning and critical thinking, [ 68 – 70 ]. The article suggests, “Maybe we should just admit that a four-year, face-to-face college education is a good thing, but we’re not sure why” [ 68 ] (p. 6).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this study did not use pre-post learning assessments. It may be important to explore the use of assessments, although under scrutiny in the literature [47,48,50], as a strategy to link learning networks to learning outcomes [68][69][70]. Second, this study only looked at classroom interactions.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%