Abstract:Support from a campus recovery program is essential for many recovering students. There are a variety of recovery program components that can foster the sense of community that was so important to the students in this study.
“…For youths in SUD recovery, these challenging transitions are compounded by the need to remain sober in an ‘abstinence-hostile environment’ (Cleveland, Harris, & Wiebe, 2010): The high rates of substance use on campuses (Hingson, Zha, & Weitzman, 2009; Wechsler & Nelson, 2008) make college attendance a severe threat to sobriety that must often be faced without one’s established support network (Bell et al, 2009; Woodford, 2001). Combined, these factors can lead to isolation when ‘fitting in’ is critical, and/or to yielding to peer pressure to use alcohol or drugs, both enhancing relapse risks (Harris, Baker, Kimball, & Shumway, 2008; Woodford, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experts’ calls for campus-based services for recovering students (Dickard, Downs, & Cavanaugh, 2011; Doyle, 1999) have thus far been largely unheeded (Bell, et al, 2009; Botzet, Winters, & Fahnhorst, 2007; Cleveland, Harris, Baker, Herbert, & Dean, 2007). The US Department of Education noted that ‘the education system’s role as part of the nation’s recovery and relapse prevention support system is still emerging.’ (p.10 (Dickard, et al, 2011).…”
Relapse rates are high among individuals with substance use disorders (SUD), and for young people pursuing a college education, the high rates of substance use on campus can jeopardize recovery. Collegiate Recovery Programs (CRPs) are an innovative campus-based model of recovery support that is gaining popularity but remains under-investigated. This study reports on the first nationwide survey of CRP-enrolled students (N = 486 from 29 different CRPs). Using an online survey, we collected information on background, SUD and recovery history, and current functioning. Most students (43% females, mean age = 26) had used multiple substances, had high levels of SUD severity, high rates of treatment and 12-step participation. Fully 40% smoke. Many reported criminal justice involvement and periods of homelessness. Notably, many reported being in recovery from, and currently engaging in multiple behavioral addictions-e.g., eating disorders, and sex and love addiction. Findings highlight the high rates of co-occurring addictions in this under-examined population and underline the need for treatment, recovery support programs and college health services to provide integrated support for mental health and behavioral addictions to SUD-affected young people.
“…For youths in SUD recovery, these challenging transitions are compounded by the need to remain sober in an ‘abstinence-hostile environment’ (Cleveland, Harris, & Wiebe, 2010): The high rates of substance use on campuses (Hingson, Zha, & Weitzman, 2009; Wechsler & Nelson, 2008) make college attendance a severe threat to sobriety that must often be faced without one’s established support network (Bell et al, 2009; Woodford, 2001). Combined, these factors can lead to isolation when ‘fitting in’ is critical, and/or to yielding to peer pressure to use alcohol or drugs, both enhancing relapse risks (Harris, Baker, Kimball, & Shumway, 2008; Woodford, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experts’ calls for campus-based services for recovering students (Dickard, Downs, & Cavanaugh, 2011; Doyle, 1999) have thus far been largely unheeded (Bell, et al, 2009; Botzet, Winters, & Fahnhorst, 2007; Cleveland, Harris, Baker, Herbert, & Dean, 2007). The US Department of Education noted that ‘the education system’s role as part of the nation’s recovery and relapse prevention support system is still emerging.’ (p.10 (Dickard, et al, 2011).…”
Relapse rates are high among individuals with substance use disorders (SUD), and for young people pursuing a college education, the high rates of substance use on campus can jeopardize recovery. Collegiate Recovery Programs (CRPs) are an innovative campus-based model of recovery support that is gaining popularity but remains under-investigated. This study reports on the first nationwide survey of CRP-enrolled students (N = 486 from 29 different CRPs). Using an online survey, we collected information on background, SUD and recovery history, and current functioning. Most students (43% females, mean age = 26) had used multiple substances, had high levels of SUD severity, high rates of treatment and 12-step participation. Fully 40% smoke. Many reported criminal justice involvement and periods of homelessness. Notably, many reported being in recovery from, and currently engaging in multiple behavioral addictions-e.g., eating disorders, and sex and love addiction. Findings highlight the high rates of co-occurring addictions in this under-examined population and underline the need for treatment, recovery support programs and college health services to provide integrated support for mental health and behavioral addictions to SUD-affected young people.
“…This same logic of the least restrictive environment is applied to universities providing treatment on campus for students who are in recovery (Bell et al, 2009). Several universities have counseling centers in which individual counseling is provided and referrals are made if treatment is needed.…”
Section: Strategy/interventionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several universities have counseling centers in which individual counseling is provided and referrals are made if treatment is needed. Some universities will provide residence halls that do not allow any alcohol on the premises for students wishing for such an environment (Bell et al, 2009), but often alcohol is brought into the residence hall anyway, with little repercussions, if any, against the violators. These programs are useful but still fail to provide students with a more comprehensive approach to students in recovery.…”
Section: Strategy/interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Bell et al (2009), students within the CSAR program were asked what made the program successful for them. The four most common responses were having an already created recovery community, support from program staff, availability of on-campus meetings, and academic support.…”
Section: Downloaded By [Northeastern University] At 20:52 05 October mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.