2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2022.3141584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISTDU-Net: Infrared Small-Target Detection U-Net

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data-driven CNN is able to learn features adaptively from images and outperforms model-driven methods for the detection of infrared small targets. According to different processing paradigms, CNN-based methods for SIRST detection can be divided into detection-based [19][20][21][22] and segmentation-based methods [12,13,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The detectionbased method outputs the position and scale information of targets directly for the input image, in the same way as generic target detection algorithms, such as Faster RCNN [30] and SSD [31].…”
Section: Detection-based Infrared Small Target Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data-driven CNN is able to learn features adaptively from images and outperforms model-driven methods for the detection of infrared small targets. According to different processing paradigms, CNN-based methods for SIRST detection can be divided into detection-based [19][20][21][22] and segmentation-based methods [12,13,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The detectionbased method outputs the position and scale information of targets directly for the input image, in the same way as generic target detection algorithms, such as Faster RCNN [30] and SSD [31].…”
Section: Detection-based Infrared Small Target Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the segmentation networks use the encoder-decoder structure, with the encoder condensing the image to extract features and the decoder stretching the features to obtain the segmentation mask. The differences of these methods are reflected in model design [12,[23][24][25], feature optimization [26][27][28][29], and feature fusion [13]. Fang et al converts target segmentation into residual prediction, and the network outputs the background image [23], while training the segmentation network, TBCNet [24] adds a classification network as the semantic constraint to improve the learning ability of the network for image features.…”
Section: Segmentation-based Infrared Small Target Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hou et al [19] constructed a feature extraction framework, combining manual feature methods to build a mapping network between feature maps and small target likelihoods in images. Hou et al [20] converted a single infrared image frame into a probabilistic likelihood map of the target in terms of the image pixels, introduced feature groups into network downsampling at the perception layer, enhanced the small target feature group weights to improve the representation of small targets, and introduced a skip connection layer with full convolution. Ma et al [21] proposed a small infrared target detection network with generated labels and feature mapping to deal with the low contrast and low signal-to-noise ratio characteristics of small infrared targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have been inspired by small-object detection methods and have proposed detection models suitable for small objects. The optimized methods of these models can be categorized into spatial-temporal information fusion [15][16][17], residual/background information prediction [18,19], optimized region proposal [20,21], and multiscale information fusion [22][23][24][25]. The spatial-temporal information fusion method reduces static noise by combining adjacent frames in an infrared image sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%