2005
DOI: 10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.01036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues on Robust Adaptive Feedback Control

Abstract: We discuss recent progress in the field of robust adaptive control with special emphasis on methodologies that use multiple-model architectures. We emphasize that the selection of the number of models, estimators and compensators in such architectures must be based on precise definition of the robust performance requirements. We illustrate some of the concepts and outstanding issues for a new methodology that blends robust nonadaptive mixed µ-synthesis and stochastic hypothesis-testing concepts leading to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This degree is a function of the system inputs, outputs and time. The multimodel approach has often been used for the modelling and control of nonlinear systems (Porfirio et al, 2003;Athans et al, 2005) and for fault diagnosis (Bhagwat et al, 2003;Gatzke and Doyle, 2002;Rodrigues et al, 2008). Some authors refer to it as a gain scheduling strategy (Leith and Leithead, 2000), or Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) systems with the same formalism (Hamdi et al, 2011), or interpolated controllers (Banerjee et al, 1995) and switching controllers (Narendra et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This degree is a function of the system inputs, outputs and time. The multimodel approach has often been used for the modelling and control of nonlinear systems (Porfirio et al, 2003;Athans et al, 2005) and for fault diagnosis (Bhagwat et al, 2003;Gatzke and Doyle, 2002;Rodrigues et al, 2008). Some authors refer to it as a gain scheduling strategy (Leith and Leithead, 2000), or Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) systems with the same formalism (Hamdi et al, 2011), or interpolated controllers (Banerjee et al, 1995) and switching controllers (Narendra et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [25], we have the following convergence result of the weighting algorithm (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18). For more details on the proof of the theorem, see Lemma A.2 in the appendix.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the state estimates of MMAE with the weighting algorithm (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18) will converge to the optimal estimates given by the jth KF corresponding to M j , that is,x k →x j k 28…”
Section: Theorem 4 If the Following Conditions Are Satisfiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This algorithm can be used in the same manner as the classical multiple model algorithms for other applications. Examples of such applications are, but not limited to, multiple model adaptive control (Athans et al, 2005), fault-tolerant control (Zhang and Jiang, 2001) and approximation of nonlinear systems with multiple models (Banerjee et al, 1997). This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%