Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334) 2000
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2000.879156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in fault detectability for dynamic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fault detectability in [4] was defined as a fault on a component of the system is said to be detectable, if and only if, the fault occurs after a certain time, in spite of disturbances, the The fault diagnosability of linear systems has been widely studied by researchers. A fault in linear systems was detectable or strongly detectable if it was possible to construct a residual generator that was sensitive to the fault or the constant fault while decoupling all disturbances in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fault detectability in [4] was defined as a fault on a component of the system is said to be detectable, if and only if, the fault occurs after a certain time, in spite of disturbances, the The fault diagnosability of linear systems has been widely studied by researchers. A fault in linear systems was detectable or strongly detectable if it was possible to construct a residual generator that was sensitive to the fault or the constant fault while decoupling all disturbances in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L f i k 1 (14) the termination condition of recursion is 9k ) k C1 D k . Generated minimum dual distribution 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V&C for these neural schemes must start from a clear definition of the SFDIA and AFDIA system requirements followed by the introduction of ad-hoc analytical tools for assessing the closed-loop stability of the system leading to the final system certification. These issues are not trivial and their resolution is a critical phase prior to the actual implementation of artificial intelligence fault-tolerant control schemes on on-board computers [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FD scheme requirements, in fact, specify the desired functions of the scheme without describing the details about their implementation. The definition of detectability condition as a system property that does not depend on the adopted FD scheme has been recently proposed in [2]. This condition can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Validation Of Fd Systems Requirements: Fault Detectability Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified block diagram of the system is shown in Figure 2 [1,2]. ) s ( G o represents the non-linear dynamics of the inverted pendulum, r K and x K implement the control law, ) s ( H d describes the effects of disturbances within the system, ) t ( r is the reference signal for the position of the cart, ) t ( d is the disturbance input, ) t ( f is the fault input used to represent the occurrence of a fault on the system outputs, ) t ( x is the system output (actual output), ) t ( y is the sensor's output (measured output).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%