2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISS properties of nonholonomic vehicles

Abstract: The paper presents the first result on nonholonomic systems enjoying Input to State Stability (ISS) properties. Although it is known that smooth stabilizability implies ISS, the converse is not generally true. This leaves the possibility of non smoothly stabilizable systems being ISS with respect to a particular input, after an appropriate feedback transformation. This is shown to be true for the case of the unicycle with a dynamic extension, in a particular topology induced by a metric appropriate for this ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with K defined in (18). Replacing (20) into (16), the error dynamics of the closed-loop system become…”
Section: Full State Feedback Formation Control (Fsfb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with K defined in (18). Replacing (20) into (16), the error dynamics of the closed-loop system become…”
Section: Full State Feedback Formation Control (Fsfb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research on robot formation control and motion planning, the problem formulations can be classified into three groups [2,10]: 1) A robot in a team is designated as the leader, and is first commanded to follow a predefined pose trajectory (position and orientation) to lead the team. The other robots in the team are moving by following the leader while having to satisfy a set of task-related geometric constraints [21]; 2) With the concept of virtual structure, the robot team is modeled as a single structure, in which the motion of each robot is translated from the desired global structure [7]; and 3) The robot team is desired to provide a group behavior, and each single robot's motion is subject to a weighted average of several behaviors [1].…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leader motion can be determined by a calculated trajectory or by teleoperation; and the followers' motion is determined by tracking the leader with some geometrical restrictions. This motion can change dynamically over time, if necessary [2]. These leaders can be real robots or, as proposed in [3], virtual leaders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%