2016
DOI: 10.2979/israelstudies.21.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Israeli and Palestinian Memories and Historical Narratives of the 1948 War—An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The year of the Nakba holds significant importance in the Palestinian people's history, representing a momentous disruption in the continuous progression of historical events and the passage of time in Palestinian history (Masalha, 2009). Also, 1948 is considered a significant event in the Middle East, particularly for the Israelis and Palestinians who were directly involved (Sela & Kadish, 2016). Israel's initial engagements with the Arab world were characterized by upheaval, originating from the dispute over Palestine under Ottoman rule and intensifying during the British Mandate, and culminating in the 1948 war (Zisser, 2023).…”
Section: : Palestine-israel War (Nakba) and Palestinian Refugee Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The year of the Nakba holds significant importance in the Palestinian people's history, representing a momentous disruption in the continuous progression of historical events and the passage of time in Palestinian history (Masalha, 2009). Also, 1948 is considered a significant event in the Middle East, particularly for the Israelis and Palestinians who were directly involved (Sela & Kadish, 2016). Israel's initial engagements with the Arab world were characterized by upheaval, originating from the dispute over Palestine under Ottoman rule and intensifying during the British Mandate, and culminating in the 1948 war (Zisser, 2023).…”
Section: : Palestine-israel War (Nakba) and Palestinian Refugee Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elderly still carry the memory of their displacement, but the documentation and transmission of these memories to the younger generations has been complicated. On the one hand, due to political pressures from the outside (Israeli Military Rule) and inside (the Palestinian National movement), these memories became infused with political agendas (Masalha, 2005;Sela & Kadish, 2016). On the other hand, many of these memories had been silenced and suppressed.…”
Section: Arab-palestinian Citizens In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, the Arab-Palestinian narrative of the 1948 war has been gaining renewed scholarly attention (Masalha, 2012). Oral history projects are being launched, recollections are being documented, memoires are being written and researched (Sela & Kadish, 2016). For example, Sorek (2015) investigates the development of collective memory and national commemoration among the Palestinian citizens of Israel.…”
Section: Arab-palestinian Citizens In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakba commemoration among Palestinians and in Israel in general is conflictual and power driven. Palestinians living in Israel, for example, carry a unique position in Palestinian society, as they are able to commemorate the Nakba in physical proximity to where it actually happened in present-day Israel, where exiled Palestinians are not allowed to set foot (Sela & Kadish, 2016). However, as Israeli citizens, their memory processes operate under complex and contested interactions.…”
Section: Commemorating and Negating The Nakba In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Israeli citizens, their memory processes operate under complex and contested interactions. What for Palestinians living in Israel is a catastrophe, for Jewish Israelis subscribing to the Zionist ideal, is the fulfillment of a dream and a redemptive moment (Sela & Kadish, 2016; Sorek, 2015). As such, a zero-sum game between the narratives exists (Sorek, 2015), as for many Jewish Israelis “even the slightest symbolic gesture [of reminding the Nakba] raises the fear of entering a slippery slope that would end Jewish national sovereignty” (Sorek, 2015, p. 8).…”
Section: Commemorating and Negating The Nakba In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%