2022
DOI: 10.1186/s42269-022-00841-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) calscreener: automated peculiarities of antimicrobial therapy and metabolism depth of multidrug resistant bacteria

Abstract: Background The global development of innovative antimicrobial drugs and drug design techniques has been necessitated by the persistent increase of multidrug resistant infections. Regardless of advances in technology for detecting pathogenic bacteria and their resistance genes (DNA-based assays), most bacteriological studies of infections still use conventional cultural techniques and susceptibility testing as reference standards. Commonly used conventional assays such as the disc diffusion test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More frequently used method for the phenotypic determination of the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics is the disc diffusion method, clearly showing the pattern of susceptibility or resistance to each antibiotic tested, measured through the zone of inhibition. Automated methods of testing antimicrobial resistance have been developed over the years, including the Vitek 2 system, BD Phoenix M50, Microscan, IMC calScreener among (Anjum 2015;Hong et al 2019;Jayol et al 2018;Sivaraman et al 2021;Bayode et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More frequently used method for the phenotypic determination of the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics is the disc diffusion method, clearly showing the pattern of susceptibility or resistance to each antibiotic tested, measured through the zone of inhibition. Automated methods of testing antimicrobial resistance have been developed over the years, including the Vitek 2 system, BD Phoenix M50, Microscan, IMC calScreener among (Anjum 2015;Hong et al 2019;Jayol et al 2018;Sivaraman et al 2021;Bayode et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jayol et al (2018) further stated that automated systems such as BD Phoenix, MicroScan, and Vitek2 cannot be used to detect colistin resistance due to high error rates when compared to BMD. Bayode et al (2022) reviewed the use of isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) calScreener and extensively discussed its use in the determination of susceptibility of Grampositive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as biofilms of polymicrobial nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection limit of isothermal microcalorimetry is 200 nW, meaning that only as few as 100,000 bacteria are needed for detection, since a typical growing bacterium generates around 2 pW (8). This makes this real-time detection technique highly sensitive and useful in multi-variable studies, which consequently is an adequate tool for susceptibility testing of various antimicrobials (4, 9, 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%