2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.094017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isospin-violating dark matter at the LHC

Abstract: We consider a toy model of dark matter with a gauge singlet Dirac fermion that has contact interactions to quarks that differ for right-handed up and down quarks. This is motivated by the isospin-violating dark matter scenario that was proposed to reconcile reported hints of direct dark matter detection with bounds from nonobservation of the signal in other experiments. We discuss how the effects of isospin violation in these couplings can be observed at the LHC. By studying events with large missing transvers… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theorem predicts that, when the conditions eq. (5,6) are nearly satisfied, the cross section for uu → uuγ subprocess in pp collisions is strongly suppressed compared to the cross section estimated without the interference terms. On the other hand, the cross section for uū → uūγ subprocess in pp collisions is expected to be enhanced compared to the estimate without the interferene terms, because the up and anti-up quarks have opposite electric charges and hence the contributing diagrams have constructive interference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The theorem predicts that, when the conditions eq. (5,6) are nearly satisfied, the cross section for uu → uuγ subprocess in pp collisions is strongly suppressed compared to the cross section estimated without the interference terms. On the other hand, the cross section for uū → uūγ subprocess in pp collisions is expected to be enhanced compared to the estimate without the interferene terms, because the up and anti-up quarks have opposite electric charges and hence the contributing diagrams have constructive interference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In other words, when the conditions eqs. (5,6,7) are satisfied, the diagrams of Figure 1 have maximal destructive interference and their amplitudes sum up to zero. Consequently, if Q a = Q 1 and Q b = Q 2 hold, but Q a and Q b are not necessarily equal, the sum of the amplitudes is proportional to (Q a − Q b ) and the cross section to (Q a − Q b ) 2 in the kinematic region satisfying eqs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations