Isoscalar monopole and dipole transitions in 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>
, 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>
, and 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Si</mml:mi><mml:m

Adsley, P.; Nesterenko, V. O.; Kimura, Masaaki; Donaldson, L. M.; Neveling, R.; Brümmer, J. W.; Jenkins, D. G.; Kheswa, N. Y.; Kvasil, J.; Li, K. C. W.; Marín-Lámbarri, D. J.; Mabika, Z.; Papka, P.; Pellegri, L.; Pesudo, V.; Rebeiro, B.; Reinhard, P.‐G.; Smit, F. D.; Yahia-Chérif, W.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.044315

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 106 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The values obtained in this study are in good agreement with results from Ref. [21] which analysed angular distributions of individual states, employing a different DWBA code as well as OMPs.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The experimental procedure followed in this study is similar to that described elsewhere [21,22]. As such, only salient details are provided here.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…discussions in Refs. [21,53]). However analysis of these properties is complicated by the shape coexistence in this nucleus and so is skipped here.…”

Section: E Features Of Individual Is0 Transitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The IS0/IS2 coupling was earlier considered within the quasiparticle random phase approximation (QRPA) in 24 Mg [12-14, 17, 20, 21] and 28 Si [21]. However, in the study [21], the narrow IS0 peaks in 24 Mg and 28 Si were not specifically discussed. Furthermore, one can dispute whether the low-energy narrow IS0 peak in 24 Mg has been correctly assigned (and used in the QRPA analysis) in the RCNP studies [12,14,17] (see discussion in Sect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Isoscalar giant monopole resonance in $^{24}$Mg and $^{28}$Si: Effect of coupling between the isoscalar monopole and quadrupole strength

Bahini,

Nesterenko,

Usman

et al. 2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In highly deformed nuclei, there is a noticeable coupling of the Isoscalar Giant Monopole Resonance (ISGMR) and the K = 0 component of the Isoscalar Giant Quadrupole Resonance (ISGQR), which results in a double peak structure of the isoscalar monopole (IS0) strength (a narrow low-energy deformation-induced peak and a main broad ISGMR part). The energy of the narrow low-lying IS0 peak is sensitive to both the incompressibility modulus K∞ and the coupling between IS0 and isoscalar quadrupole (IS2) strength.Objective: This study aims to investigate the two-peaked structure of the ISGMR in the prolate 24 Mg and oblate 28 Si nuclei and identify among a variety of energy density functionals based on Skyrme parameterisations the one which best describes the experimental data. This will allow for conclusions regarding the nuclear incompressibility. Because of the strong IS0/IS2 coupling, the deformation splitting of the ISGQR will also be analysed. Methods: The ISGMR was excited in 24 Mg and 28 Si using α-particle inelastic scattering measurements acquired with an Eα = 196 MeV beam at scattering angles θ Lab = 0 • and 4 • . The K600 magnetic spectrometer at iThemba LABS was used to detect and momentum analyse the inelastically scattered α particles. An experimental energy resolution of ≈ 70 keV (FWHM) was attained, revealing fine structure in the excitation-energy region of the ISGMR. The IS0 strength distributions in the nuclei studied were obtained with the Difference-of-Spectrum (DoS) technique. The theoretical comparison is based on the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) with a representative set of Skyrme forces. Results: IS0 strength distributions for 24 Mg and 28 Si are extracted and compared to previously published results from experiments with a lower energy resolution. With some exceptions, a reasonable agreement is obtained. The IS0 strength is found to be separated into a narrow structure at about 13 − 14 MeV in 24 Mg, 17 − 19 MeV in 28 Si and a broad structure at 19 − 26 MeV in both nuclei. The data are compared with QRPA results. The results of the calculated characteristics of IS0 states demonstrate the strong IS0/IS2 coupling in strongly prolate 24 Mg and oblate 28 Si. The narrow IS0 peaks are shown to arise due to the deformation-induced IS0/IS2 coupling and strong collective effects. The cluster features of the narrow IS0 peak at 13.87 MeV in 24 Mg are also discussed. The best description of the IS0 data is obtained using the Skyrme force SkP δ with an associated low nuclear incompressibility K∞ = 202 MeV allowing for both the energy of the peak and integral IS0 strength in 24 Mg and 28 Si to be reproduced. The features of the ISGQR in these nuclei are also investigated. An anomalous deformation splitting of the ISGQR in oblate 28 Si is found. Conclusions: The ISGMR and ISGQR in light deformed nuclei are coupled and thus need to be described simultaneously. Only such a description is relevant and consistent. The deformation-induced narrow IS0 peaks can serve as an additional sen...

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The experimental procedure followed in this study is similar to that described elsewhere [21,22]. As such, only salient details are provided here.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…discussions in Refs. [21,53]). However analysis of these properties is complicated by the shape coexistence in this nucleus and so is skipped here.…”

Section: E Features Of Individual Is0 Transitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%