2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-017-3405-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, Separation, and Preconcentration of Biologically Active Compounds from Plant Matrices by Extraction Techniques

Abstract: adsorbents and membrane extraction for selective separation of these compounds is discussed. Potential separation process interactions are recommended; their understanding is of utmost importance for the creation of optimal conditions to extract biologically active compounds including those with estrogenic properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last few decades, chemically modified polymers have been applied for SPE: β‐cyclodextrin cross‐linked polymer , different acrylic copolymers containing CN–, –CONH 2 , –COOH groups with a different degree of substitution. Consequently, smart adsorbents with molecular finger print (Molecularly Imprinted Polymers ‐ MIP) were introduced in order to improve selective isolation .…”
Section: Purification and Pre‐concentration Of Bioactive Organic Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last few decades, chemically modified polymers have been applied for SPE: β‐cyclodextrin cross‐linked polymer , different acrylic copolymers containing CN–, –CONH 2 , –COOH groups with a different degree of substitution. Consequently, smart adsorbents with molecular finger print (Molecularly Imprinted Polymers ‐ MIP) were introduced in order to improve selective isolation .…”
Section: Purification and Pre‐concentration Of Bioactive Organic Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soxhlet extraction and maceration are classic extraction methods, which have been widely used for isolation of biologically active components due to their availability, efficiency and comprehensive applicability through many decades. Starting from these conventional extraction techniques, other modern techniques emerged with advances in technology, such as microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) or accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) . The steps required for isolation and determination of biologically active compounds are presented briefly in the form of a diagram in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical solvent extraction techniques such as Soxhlet and maceration were widely used for extraction of the main bioactive compounds including cyclitols from plant material [12][13][14]. However, modern extraction techniques such as: pressurized liquid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), which provide faster extraction, lower solvent consumption and higher efficiency have been reported as alternatives to the classical techniques [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these conventional techniques are that they consume relatively large volumes of organic solvents and low specific, energy intensive, and time‐consuming. To overcome these limitations, using molecular imprinting technology (MIT) for CAPS to extract and purify CAPS is a potential method …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, using molecular imprinting technology (MIT) for CAPS to extract and purify CAPS is a potential method. [14][15][16] MIT is a novel and multidisciplinary technology to synthesize molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) with specific selectivity properties due to the structure, shape and space memory effects, and high stability. 17 Over the past several decades, MIT has been rapidly developed and widely used in solid phase extraction, [18][19][20][21][22] chromatographic separation, 23,24 membrane separation, [25][26][27] and sensor areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%