2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, Screening, and Identification of Novel Isolates of Actinomycetes from India for Antimicrobial Applications

Abstract: The search for novel bioactive compounds from the natural environment has rapidly been gaining momentum with the increase in multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. In the present study, the antimicrobial potential of novel actinomycetes has been evaluated by initial screening of six soil samples. Primary and secondary screening was performed against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Trichophyton rubrum, and other MDR bacterial and fungal test strai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
47
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Contrary to most studies [27][28][29] where Streptomyces were mostly reported as the dominant actinomycetes isolated, in this study the most dominant strains were non-Streptomyces (66.67%). The abundance of rare actinomycetes in this study might be attributed to the creativity of supplementing the isolation media with CaCO 3 .…”
Section: Isolation and Preliminary Identification Of Actinomycetescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…1. Contrary to most studies [27][28][29] where Streptomyces were mostly reported as the dominant actinomycetes isolated, in this study the most dominant strains were non-Streptomyces (66.67%). The abundance of rare actinomycetes in this study might be attributed to the creativity of supplementing the isolation media with CaCO 3 .…”
Section: Isolation and Preliminary Identification Of Actinomycetescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the ability to produce the clear zone were presumably dependent on the secondary metabolites that were produced by test isolates. This assumption was supported by Dharmawan et al (2009) and Singh et al (2016) The resistance test isolates were S. aureus ATCC25923, E. coli ATCC25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC25853, S. pneumoniae ATCC49619, S. typhi ATCC 6539 and S. boydii (clinical isolate) that were resistant to one of the antagonistic isolates. The most sensitive one was S. aureus (clinical isolate) that was inhibited by all isolates crude extract; they vary in inhibition zone diameter.…”
Section: Primary Screening Of the Antimicrobial Producing Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In recent years, new resistant strains emerge more quickly while the rate of discovery of new antibiotics is slowing down (Oskay et al, 2004;Parungao et al, 2007). This necessitates the screening of microorganisms for antimicrobial activity for the production of new and novel drugs (Singh et al, 2016). Hence, intensive search for new antibiotics has become imperative worldwide especially from new actinomycetes (Oskay et al, 2004;Parungao et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, MIC was 2.5mg/ml against VRE, Shigella dysenteriae and Klebsella pneumoniae. 17 In contrast, Satish and Kokati(2017) reported low MIC value of 1mg/ml for MDRSA. 18 MIC value is affected by many parameters including susceptibility of organisms, type of microorganism, concentration and type of bioactive metabolites, composition of cultural medium, incubation temperature and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%