2016
DOI: 10.5455/javar.2016.c130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of Pasteurella multocida from chickens, preparation of formalin killed fowl cholera vaccine, and determination of efficacy in experimental chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, these titers increased when the protection rate increased and decreased when the protection rate decreased as shown in tables 1 and 2. The same finding was obtained by Akhtar et al (2016) found that the antibody titer in birds of group A injected with 1ml of vaccine and group B injected with 0.5 ml of vaccine were 4.513 and 4.07 respectively at primary vaccination, and 4.893 and 4.37 respectively after booster vaccination indicating significant increase in the antibody titre as compared to the titre of the primary vaccinaterd birds. The same criteriawere obtained by Jabbri and Moazeni (2005) who stated that fowl cholera vaccine consisted of serotypes 1, 3 and 4 P. multocidastrains provided 70-100% protection against challenge with homologous strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, these titers increased when the protection rate increased and decreased when the protection rate decreased as shown in tables 1 and 2. The same finding was obtained by Akhtar et al (2016) found that the antibody titer in birds of group A injected with 1ml of vaccine and group B injected with 0.5 ml of vaccine were 4.513 and 4.07 respectively at primary vaccination, and 4.893 and 4.37 respectively after booster vaccination indicating significant increase in the antibody titre as compared to the titre of the primary vaccinaterd birds. The same criteriawere obtained by Jabbri and Moazeni (2005) who stated that fowl cholera vaccine consisted of serotypes 1, 3 and 4 P. multocidastrains provided 70-100% protection against challenge with homologous strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…On the other hand, Perelman et al (1990) recorded that ELISA test did not appear to be adequate for the evaluation of the degree of protection induced in turkey flocks where turkey poults vaccinated at one day old with inactivated P. multocida bacterin showed low titers of antibody as measured by ELISA but turkeys vaccinated at three and six weeks of age responded with a higher antibody titers and were resistant to virulent challenge with P. multocida. Akhtar et al (2016) vaccinated birds with formalin killed fowl cholera bacterin, determined antibody titers using ELISA and challenged birds with virulent strain of P. multocida then concluded that the prepared formalin killed fowl cholera vaccine induce protective immune response and conferred protection against challenge protection infection caused by the virulent P. multocida strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conformation of the isolated organisms as P. multocida type B, the causal agent of haemorrhagic septicemia in buffaloes and cattle were done based on PCR as described by Townsend et al (1998), Panna et al (2015) and Akhtar et al (2016). Initially PCR was carried out to confirm the isolate as Pasteurella spp.…”
Section: Polymerase Chain Reaction (Pcr) For Pasteurella Multocida Tymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alum precipitated formalin killed FC vaccine is produced in the Livestock and Poultry Research and Production Centre (LPVRPC; formerly known as Poultry Biologics Unit) of the Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh, while the oil-adjuvant FC vaccine is produced in Livestock Research Institute (LRI), Mohakhali, Dhaka, under the Department of Livestock Services (DLS), Government of People's Republic of Bangladesh (Bag et al, 2015). But, those which are imported or prepared from field cases of FC are much more expensive and there is a chance of being severe infection if sufficient measures are not taken (Akhtar et al, 2016). It is scientifically established that immune responses are influenced by various factors, such as breed and rearing region (Rana et al, 2010), age of the hosts (Dick and Avakian, 1991), and the isolate used as vaccine seed (Akhtar et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%