2020
DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d211213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of lupeol from Grewia lasiocarpa stem bark: Antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity activities

Abstract: Abstract. Akwu N, Naidoo Y, Singh M, Thimmegowda SC, Nundkumar N, Lin J. 2020. Isolation of lupeol from Grewia lasiocarpa stem bark: Antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity activities. Biodiversitas 21: 5684-5691. Lupeol a pentacyclic triterpenoid, was extracted from the stem bark of Grewia lasiocarpa. Stem bark was macerated with chloroform (CHCl3) at 25 ± 2°C, and then purified using a silica gel column. The mobile phase was hexane (100%) and hexane: ethyl acetate (80:20) as the mobile phase. The struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1, a wide variety of extracts/solvents and techniques were reported in the literature. In detail, 25.2% of the compounds were extracted with methanol in six studies [14,[21][22][23][24][25], 47.8% with acidified methanol in two studies [13,26], 11.7% with water in two studies [2,27], 5.04% with 50% methanol in one study [24], 4.20% with petroleum ether in one study [28], 3.36% with chloroform in two studies [15,29], 2.52% with ethyl acetate in one study [2], 1.68% with aqueous acetone in one study [30], and 1.68% with 80% methanol in one study [8]. Mass spectrometry was the most commonly employed technique for the identification of bioactive compounds (81.5%) wherein one study used ESI-MS/MS, one used LC-QToF-MS, one used GC-MS, and two used NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 1, a wide variety of extracts/solvents and techniques were reported in the literature. In detail, 25.2% of the compounds were extracted with methanol in six studies [14,[21][22][23][24][25], 47.8% with acidified methanol in two studies [13,26], 11.7% with water in two studies [2,27], 5.04% with 50% methanol in one study [24], 4.20% with petroleum ether in one study [28], 3.36% with chloroform in two studies [15,29], 2.52% with ethyl acetate in one study [2], 1.68% with aqueous acetone in one study [30], and 1.68% with 80% methanol in one study [8]. Mass spectrometry was the most commonly employed technique for the identification of bioactive compounds (81.5%) wherein one study used ESI-MS/MS, one used LC-QToF-MS, one used GC-MS, and two used NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the plant parts analyzed in each study, the fruits of G. asiatica were the most explored, with five articles studying fruits alone [2,13,21,24,26,30]. Two articles focused on G. asiatica leaves [8,41], two explored G. asiatica flowers [29,42], one studied Grewia optiva leaves [27], one studied G. asiatica stems [28] and each studied G. microcos [37] and G. lasiocarpa stems [15], G. tiliaefolia bark [22], G. hirsute leaves [23], and G. optiva roots [14] and stems [25] to identify the phytochemical constituents.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations