1986
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402390310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of Drosophila mutants with abnormal proboscis extension reflex

Abstract: Drosophila mutants with defects in their proboscis extension reflex (PER) were isolated for a genetic dissection of the PER system. Five mutant strains were screened from 35,000 mutagenized flies through a twostep screening: a mass test of sugar intake, followed by an individual PER test. Mutants were classified into three complementation groups: aperA (genetical map position, 1-22.11, aperB (1-0.6) and aperC (1-0.4). The aperA mutants showed incomplete penetrance and expressivity. Some flies did not extend th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess whether the sensory processing of 7-T affected feeding behavior, we performed the Proboscis Extension Reflex (PER; [24]). When sensilla on the tarsi were unilaterally stimulated with 0.1M sucrose, a positive PER was shown by a majority of male and female flies (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess whether the sensory processing of 7-T affected feeding behavior, we performed the Proboscis Extension Reflex (PER; [24]). When sensilla on the tarsi were unilaterally stimulated with 0.1M sucrose, a positive PER was shown by a majority of male and female flies (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-day-old WT flies were first placed in a vial with fresh medium for one day and were then starved for 20–22 h in a vial plugged with a piece of Kimwipe soaked with water, before being tested. Flies fixed as in [24] were stimulated two or three times with 0.1M sucrose to confirm the robustness of their behavior. The PER was always elicited immediately after stimulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PER was examined principally as described (Kimura et al , 1986). Flies aged 3–6 days after eclosion were maintained on fresh medium for 1 day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, to determine the correlation between tarsal taste sensitivities and feeding responses to sugars, we performed the proboscis extension reflex test by stimulation of a prothoracic leg [6]. D-glucose and D-arabinose induced reflex responses of similar strengths, whereas D-sorbitol did not ( Figure S2).…”
Section: Taste Sensitivity Of External Chemosensilla: Electrophysiolomentioning
confidence: 99%