2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of cobalt hyper-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by in vivo evolutionary engineering approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we obtained copper-enriched and copper-tolerant yeasts through a number of generations smaller than reported in similar recent works [13,14,25]. This might be explained on the basis of a different experimental set-up in which relatively few rounds of selection were applied, but with longer cultivation times (72 h) and wider intervals of metal concentration (increases of 0.5 g. L -1 at each round).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, we obtained copper-enriched and copper-tolerant yeasts through a number of generations smaller than reported in similar recent works [13,14,25]. This might be explained on the basis of a different experimental set-up in which relatively few rounds of selection were applied, but with longer cultivation times (72 h) and wider intervals of metal concentration (increases of 0.5 g. L -1 at each round).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this light, the variability in copper sensitivity between Candida and Saccharomyces cells might depend (at least partly) on a different ability to limit copper uptake and its overload. Such a mechanism has been reported to protect S. cerevisiae cells from copper [26] cadmium [27] and cobalt [14] and points to a central role of the plasma membrane [28-30] and of the cell wall [31] in the onset of tolerance to heavy metals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several more applied studies have started from strains commonly used in the wine, beer, biofuel, and baking industry. The phenotypes targeted include resistance to individual stresses, such as high levels of acetate (Aarnio et al ., 1991) or ethanol (Brown & Oliver, 1982; Dinh et al ., 2008), osmotic stress (Ekberg et al ., 2013), and high concentrations of metal ions such as copper (Adamo et al ., 2012) and cobalt (Cakar et al ., 2009), as well as (improved) utilization of alternative carbon sources such as xylose and arabinose (starting from metabolically engineered strains, see also below; Sonderegger & Sauer, 2003; Wisselink et al ., 2009; Scalcinati et al ., 2012; Demeke et al ., 2013). However, in industrial settings, cells are often faced with a combination of different stresses: during brewing fermentations for example, cells encounter osmotic stress, high levels of ethanol, and nutrient deprivation (Gibson et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Natural and Artificial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly useful for obtaining genetically complex microbial phenotypes such as tolerance to inhibitors/toxic compounds or various stress types [39]. Successful results were obtained by our research group, regarding evolutionary engineering of multi-stress resistant [40], cobalt-resistant [41,42], nickel-resistant [43], and ethanol-tolerant [44] S. cerevisiae. Another example for the use of evolutionary engineering against product toxicity involves adaptive evolution for lactic acid tolerance in S. cerevisiae [31].…”
Section: Production Of Bulk Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%